Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n a mandgi · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.048 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 12 1987

Babu Ningappa Yalgundri and ors. Vs. Arunkumar Alias Basappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-12-1987

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 7, 8, 12; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14

Reported in : AIR1988Kant139; ILR1987KAR3590

Advocate for Appellant : N.A. Mandgi, Adv.

Chandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. This appeal is by defendants 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 who are appellants 1 to 5 this Court. They have suffered a Judgment and Decree in O.S.No. 41/1966 on the file of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 1987

Kishan Vs. Sakharabai

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-05-1987

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 5, 11, 18 and 25

Reported in : ILR1987KAR3422; 1987(2)KarLJ357

Advocate for Appellant : V. Krishnamurthi, Senior Adv. and ;N.A. Mandgi, Adv. ;Mahableshwar Goud, Adv. for ;Shivaraj Patil, Adv.

Nesargi, J.This is defendant's appeal. The respondents filed O.S. No. 155 of 1978 in the Court of the Munsiff, Basavakalyan, under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as H.A....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1992

Basappa Vs. Siddagangamma

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-10-1992

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 18 and 18(2); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5 and 11

Reported in : II(1992)DMC167; ILR1992KAR1798; 1992(2)KarLJ357

Advocate for Appellant : Mirle L. Krishnamurthy and ;H.S. Rama Rao, Advs.

Vasantha Kumar, J. 1. This Regular First Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 1-3-80 passed by the Court of the Civil Judge, Madhugiri, in R.A.No.183/78 while dismissing the appeal the first appellate Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 28 1967

Malatibai and ors. Vs. the Divisional Controller, Belgaum and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-28-1967

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Reported in : AIR1968Kant208; AIR1968Mys208; (1967)2MysLJ617

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. N. A.Mandgi

Gopivallabha Iyengar, J. (1) This appeal is filed against the order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Belgaum, in File No. GB/WCA 3/1965, dated October 6, 1966.(2) One Madhukar Mangesh Kekare was an employee of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 1989

Basappa Mallappa Sonnad Vs. Bhagawwa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-02-1989

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 6 and 8

Reported in : ILR1989KAR2261; 1989(2)KarLJ596

Advocate for Appellant : N.A. Mandagi, Adv.

Chandrakantaraj Urs, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 17-11 -1977 passed in O.S.No. 46/1975 on the file of the Civil Judge, Chikodi. The appeal is by the sole defendant. We...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 1987

Huvappa Mahadev Mense Vs. Land Tribunal

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-10-1987

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 8, 45, 45A, 108 and 142; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 1 to 87A and 88; Mysore Act, 1957 - Sections 5

Reported in : ILR1987KAR2797; 1987(2)KarLJ327

Advocate for Appellant : N.A. Mandgi, Adv.

Shivashankar Bhat, J.1. These appeals are by Huvappa, the petitioner, in W.P. Nos. 6517 and 7971 of 1977. He claimed the status of a tenant entitled to registration as an occupant under Section 45 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1985

Narayana Govind Anikhindi Vs. Venugopal Sitaram Sarada

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-15-1985

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1)

Reported in : ILR1985KAR2916; 1986(1)KarLJ314

Advocate for Appellant : N.A. Mandgi, Adv.

ORDERChandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. This is a landlord's Revision under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code and is directed against the order and decree dated 2-9-1983 passed by the District Judge, Bijapur, in Civil Revision Petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 1986

Punnaswamy C. Goudar Vs. Belgaum City Municipal Corporation

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-01-1986

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Sections 355 and 358

Reported in : ILR1986KAR3372

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mandgi, Adv. for N.A. Mandgi, Adv.

ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. In these Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has sought for quashing the Notices dated 24-12-1979 bearing No. HLT/LCN/KMC/3326 (produced as Annexure-A in W.P. 10916/81) ; and dated 29th December,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1963

Dundappa Shivalingappa Adi Vs. S.G. Motor Transport Company (P) Ltd. a ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-26-1963

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(2), 433, 482, 483 and 634; Court fees Act, 1870 - Schedule - Article 11

Reported in : AIR1966Kant150; AIR1966Mys150; [1967]37CompCas114(Kar); (1965)1MysLJ557

Advocate for Appellant : N.A. Mandgi, Adv.

Somnath Iyer, J.1. The question is whether the court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal is adequate. 2. The appellant made an application under section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956, for an order that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 1976

Kallawwa Vs. Tamanna Muraxi Patil and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-21-1976

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1977Kant45; ILR1976KAR1247; 1976(2)KarLJ23

Advocate for Appellant : N.A. Mandgi, Adv.

ORDER1. A claim to Tatil Inarn lands consequent on the abolition of a Village Office, came for consideration before the Assistant Commissioner, Chikodi. The petitioner and respondent-1 were rival claimants, The Assistant Commissioner, by his order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial