Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n a dalvi · Page 1 of about 34 results (0.048 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 15 2009

Mrs. Irene Pais, Mahim, Mumbai Vs. Dr.Anil Pinto Denisandra, Dadar, Mu ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-15-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. M.S. Kamath, A.R. for the Complainant. Mr. A.V. Patwardhan, Advocate for O.P.No.1. Mr. N.P. Dalvi, Advocate for O.P.No.2.

Per Justice Mr. B.B. Vagyani, Honble President We heard Dr. M.S. Kamath, A.R. for the complainant, Mr. A.V. Patwardhan, Advocate for O.P.No.1 and Mr. N.P. Dalvi, Advocate for O.P.No.2. Complainant is the mother of deceased Alfred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2000

Rajmal Lakhichand Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Mar-24-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

1. The main grievance projected in this appeal by the assesses is that the learned CIT(A) is not justified in confirming the addition of Rs. 92,29,856 in respect of payments/adjustments against the purchase price of silver....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2000

Rajmal Lakhichand Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Mar-24-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

1. The main grievance projected in this appeal by the assessee is that the learned CIT(A) is not justified in confirming the addition of Rs. 92,29,856 in respect of payments/adjustments against the purchase price of silver....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 24 2000

Rajmal Lakhichand Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Mar-24-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)79ITD84(Pune.)

The main grievance projected in this appeal by the assessee is that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) is not justified in confirming the addition of Rs. 92,29,856 in respect of payments/adjustments against the purchase price of silver....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 1995

Bharat Forge Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Feb-21-1995

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1995)53ITD575(Pune.)

1. These cross-appeals by the assessee and the revenue for assessment year 1990-91 have been directed against the order of the learned CIT(A).2. For the year under consideration, the assessee-company was engaged in the business of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1995

Standard Chartered Bank Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-03-1995

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1995]54ITD570(Mum)

ORDERPer Shri V. Dongzathang, Vice-President - These cross-appeals are directed against the orders of the CIT (Appeals) for the assessment years 1989-90 and 1990-91.2. The assessee is an International Bank functioning in India through 24 branches...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1995

Walchand Nagar Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-09-1995

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1995)(79)ELT485TriDel

1. The above appeals arise out of the order dated 24-4-1991 of the Collector of Central Excise, Pune, confirming demand of duty of Rs. 14,69,880/- on 4 milling machines viz. 2 Nos. HB 630 and 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 1991

income-tax Officer Vs. Sabine Laboratories (P.) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-29-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1992)40ITD300(Mum.)

1. These two appeals are by the revenue against the orders of the CIT(A), for the assessment years 1984-85 and 1985-86. The dispute in these appeals is regarding the validity of the returns filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 1996

Sangli Bank Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Sep-30-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1997)60ITD536(Pune.)

1. Various grounds have been taken by the assessee in this appeal.However, ground Nos. 2,3 and 5 have not been pressed by the learned counsel for the assessee. Hence the same are dismissed. Therefore, only ground...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1997

Collr. of C. Ex. Vs. Nirlon Synthetic Fibres and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-25-1997

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1997)LC385Tri(Delhi)

1. This appeal has been referred to the Larger Bench by the Bombay Bench as they were of the opinion that the earlier decision taken by that Bench in Collector of Central Excise v. Reliance Textile...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial