Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: murlidhar and · Page 1 of about 2,220 results (0.178 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 01 2004

Brijendra Pratap Singh (Deceased by Lr) and anr. Vs. Smt. Prem Lata Si ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-01-2004

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act; Hindu law

Reported in : AIR2005All113; 2005(3)AWC2277

Advocate for Appellant : R.G. Padia, ;Prakash Padia, ;Murlidhar Avinash Chandra and ;A.C. Tripthi, Advs.

ORDERJanardan Sahai, J.1. This appeal is about a house No. C-7/67 situate in Mohalla Senpura, at Varanasi. A dispute arose between two brothers Surendra Pratap Singh and Brijendra Pratap Singh. Surendra Pratap Singh brought a suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2002

Kr. Om Autar Vs. District Commandant Home Guard and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-08-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation) of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(8); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 152

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2839

Advocate for Appellant : Krishna Mohan Agarwal, ;Rajendra Kumar, ;Murlidhar, ;R.P. Singh and ;P.K. Singh, Advs.

S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, inter-alia, challenging the order dated 27.2.1985 passed by the respondent No. 3 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) judgment and order dated 19.5.1987 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2000

Baldev Singh Vs. Tahsildar and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-25-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961 - Sections 2(8), 18(1) and 19A; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation fro SCs,STs and OBCs) Act, 1994 - Sections 2 and 13; Constitution of India - Articles 16(4) and 38; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh State Commission for Backward Clases Act, 1996 - Sections 3 and 9; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 23A(1)

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2781; (2000)3UPLBEC2262

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Singh, ;Murlidhar and ;K.P. Upadhyaya, Advs.

G.P. Mathur, J. 1. The petitioner a 'Jat Sikh' was elected as a member of Zila Panchayat, Rampur. In the election held for various panchayats in the State in June, 2000, in accordance with Section 18(1)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 19 2005

Rajmahal Pahad Bachao Andolan Through President and ors. Vs. Union of ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-19-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908; Santhal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949 - Sections 20, 20(2) and 41; Panchayat (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 - Sections 4; Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 9, 11 and 11A; Jharkhand Panchayat Act - Sections 6; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Sections 25 and 26; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973; Coalmines (Nationalisation) (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 3(3); Transfer of Property Act; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation, 1959 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 243M(4)

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR331(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : S. Murlidhar,; Rashmi Katyan and; Ratnakar Bhengra,

Altamas Kabir, C.J.1. Although the matter started out as public interest litigation, during the course of submissions, innumerable affidavits were filed rendering the litigation adversarial in nature.2. The writ petitioners claim to have filed the writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2004

Cit Vs. Brahm Swarup Tandon and Co.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-05-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]142TAXMAN569(All)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mahajan, for the Revenue Murlidhar, for the Assessee

ORDERThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi has referred the following question of law for opinion to this court under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the Act :'Whether the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2003

Salimbhai Abdulgaffar Shaikh Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-04-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167, 173(2), 173(8), 389, 437, 439, and 482; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 34, 34(1), 34(3), 34(4) 35, 39, 47(7), 49, 49(6) and 49(7)

Reported in : (2003)3GLR1899

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Thakkar, Sr. Counsel,; Y.M. Thakkar,; E.E. Saiyed

C.K. Buch, J.Rule, Mr. A. D. Oza learned Public Prosecutor waives Rule on behalf of the respondent-Government in all matters.1. All these Misc. Cri. Applications have been moved by the accused persons for bail in connection...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1999

Indian Wood Products Co. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-23-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4) and 51; Forest Produce Rules, 1978 - Rules 25 and 28; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 301 and 304

Reported in : AIR1999All222

Advocate for Appellant : Vishnu Gupta, Adv.

Binod Kumar Roy, J.1. Whether Factory or Mill prepared 'Catechu' or Katha is a 'Forest Produce', as defined under Section 2(4) of the Forest Act is the real question which requires our adjudication in this writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 1973

Mohammad Tahair Vs. Syed Khaja Ali and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-03-1973

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53-A; Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 47(1)

Reported in : AIR1973Kant307; AIR1973Mys307; (1973)2MysLJ94

Advocate for Appellant : N. Santosh Hegde and ;A.M. Farooq, Advs.

Venkataswami, J.1. This is a defendant's appeal under Section 96 of the C. P. Code. The suit in question was O. S. No. 72 of 1968 on the file of the Civil Judge at Bidar. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1935

Shib Charan Das Vs. Muqaddam and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-12-1935

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1936All62; 158Ind.Cas.643

Iqbal Ahmad, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit for sale on a mortgage dated 8th March 1919, and the sole question for consideration in the appeal is whether -or not the Courts below were...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 1997

Pakkirisamy Vs. State of T.N.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-30-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - , - Sections 164; Evidence Act, - Sections 27

Reported in : 1997(2)ALD(Cri)695; 1998CriLJ89; JT1997(8)SC310; 1997(6)SCALE315; (1997)8SCC158; 1998(1)LC101(SC)

1. The Sessions Court of East Thanjavur at Nagappattinam as also the High Court at Madras by their concurrent judgments and orders found the appellant guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 392 IPC...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial