Advanced Search Results
In Re: Ktc Private Limited,
Allahabad
Mar-11-2005
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 394(1), 394(2), 394(3), 394A, 397 and 398; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 76 and 80
[2006]66SCL241(All)
Piyush Agarwal and ;Satwinder Singh, Advs.
S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. The present Company Petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been fried by KTC Private Limited haying its Registered Office at 117/H-2/202, Pandu Nagar, Kanpur-208005, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGuchhan Vs. District Magistrate and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-02-1982
Criminal
1983CriLJ1237
Sri. Murli Dhar
M.N. Shukla, J.1. By means of this petition the petitioner has challenged his detention by an order dated 26-4-1982 passed by the District Magistrate. Rampur, under Section 3(2), National Security Act, 1980 (hereinafter called the Act)....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDurga Prasad Tandon and Others Vs. Gaur Brahman Sabha, Nainital and Ot ...
Allahabad
May-20-2000
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96(3) and 100 - Order 23, Rules 3 and 3A - Order 43, Rules 1, 1A and 1A(2); Indian Contract Act, 1872
2000(4)AWC2848
Murli Dhar and ;R.K. Khanna, Advs.
P. K. Jain, J.1. This is plaintiffs second appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the trial court dismissing the Original Suit No. 155 of 1989 and the decree of the lower appellate court affirming...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Laxmi NaraIn and anr. Vs. Smt. Savitri Devi and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-21-2004
TenancyProperty
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 16 - Rules 8 and 9
2004(4)AWC3262
W.H. Khan, ;Murli Dhar, ;R.P. Singh, ;K.M. Dayal, ;B. Malik and ;J.N. Mishra, Advs.
Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The District Magistrate granted permission to the landlord Under Section 3 (1) (a) of U. P. Act No. 3 of 1947 to file a civil suit for ejectment of Sri Parag Das and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDamodar Lal Vs. Lalli Lal and ors.
Rajasthan
Mar-12-1984
FamilyProperty
Hindu Law; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114
AIR1985Raj55
M.M. Tiwari and; Dalip Singh, Advs.
M.C. Jain, J. 1. This is an appeal by defendant 1 against the judgment and decree dated October 29.1971, of the District Judge, Jaipur District. Jaipur, affirming the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Jaipur...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Ram Lal and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-18-1919
CriminalContract
(1919)ILR61All390
Piggott, J.1. This is an application for revision of an order of the Sessions Judge of Jhansi, declining to interfere with an order by a first class Magistrate of the same district passed under Section 2...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Lal and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Feb-08-1919
Criminal
AIR1919All164; 51Ind.Cas.205
Piggott, J.1. This is an application for revision of an order of the Sessions Judge of Jhansi, declining to interfere with an order by a First Class Magistrate of the same district passed under Section 2...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.K. Mittal and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-09-2002
Property
Constitution of India - Article 14; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Development Area Act, 1976 - Sections 3, 9(2), 14 and 15; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Development Area (Preparation and Finalisation of Plan) Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 2, 4(1) and 11
2002(1)AWC558; (2002)1UPLBEC444
Murli Dhar and ;S. Farman Ahmad Naqvi, Advs.
M. Katju, J. 1. This petition furnishes a typical instance of a widespread malady which has infected our society and body politic, namely, the belief in the rich and mighty of our country that they are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVidya Vinod Alias Chunnulal and Etc. Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Feb-10-1998
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 10(7), 13(2), 13(3), 16 and 16(1); Prevention of Food Adulteration (Amendment) Act, 1976; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1985 - Rule 44-A; Constitution of India - Article 21
1998CriLJ3318
R.B. Sahai, Murli Dhar and;G.N. Shukla, Adv.
ORDERP.K. Jain, J.1.These four criminal revisions raise common question of law which is whether in view of the provisions of Section 16 of the-Prevention of Food Adulteration Act as amended by Amending Act No. 34 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohamed Oomer, Mohamed Noorullah Vs. S.M. Noorudin
Mumbai
Aug-13-1951
Intellectual Property Rights
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 561 - Order 41, Rules 22 and 23; Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 70, 74, 76 and 77; Trade Marks Rules - Rules 34 and 36
AIR1952Bom165; (1952)54BOMLR28
N.A. Palkhiwalla, Adv.;C.K. Daphtary, Solicitor General
Chagla, C.J.[1] This is an appeal which arises out of an order made by the Register of Trade Marks. The respondent applied for registration of his trade mark on 21-8-1942. The application was advertised on 1-10-1945,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »