Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: murli dhar · Page 1 of about 284 results (0.073 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 11 2005

In Re: Ktc Private Limited,

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-11-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 394(1), 394(2), 394(3), 394A, 397 and 398; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 76 and 80

Reported in : [2006]66SCL241(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Piyush Agarwal and ;Satwinder Singh, Advs.

S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. The present Company Petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been fried by KTC Private Limited haying its Registered Office at 117/H-2/202, Pandu Nagar, Kanpur-208005, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1982

Guchhan Vs. District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-02-1982

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1237

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Murli Dhar

M.N. Shukla, J.1. By means of this petition the petitioner has challenged his detention by an order dated 26-4-1982 passed by the District Magistrate. Rampur, under Section 3(2), National Security Act, 1980 (hereinafter called the Act)....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2000

Durga Prasad Tandon and Others Vs. Gaur Brahman Sabha, Nainital and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-20-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96(3) and 100 - Order 23, Rules 3 and 3A - Order 43, Rules 1, 1A and 1A(2); Indian Contract Act, 1872

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2848

Advocate for Appellant : Murli Dhar and ;R.K. Khanna, Advs.

P. K. Jain, J.1. This is plaintiffs second appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the trial court dismissing the Original Suit No. 155 of 1989 and the decree of the lower appellate court affirming...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 21 2004

Laxmi NaraIn and anr. Vs. Smt. Savitri Devi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-21-2004

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 16 - Rules 8 and 9

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3262

Advocate for Appellant : W.H. Khan, ;Murli Dhar, ;R.P. Singh, ;K.M. Dayal, ;B. Malik and ;J.N. Mishra, Advs.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The District Magistrate granted permission to the landlord Under Section 3 (1) (a) of U. P. Act No. 3 of 1947 to file a civil suit for ejectment of Sri Parag Das and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1984

Damodar Lal Vs. Lalli Lal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-12-1984

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1985Raj55

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Tiwari and; Dalip Singh, Advs.

M.C. Jain, J. 1. This is an appeal by defendant 1 against the judgment and decree dated October 29.1971, of the District Judge, Jaipur District. Jaipur, affirming the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Jaipur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1919

Emperor Vs. Ram Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-18-1919

Subject : CriminalContract

Reported in : (1919)ILR61All390

Piggott, J.1. This is an application for revision of an order of the Sessions Judge of Jhansi, declining to interfere with an order by a first class Magistrate of the same district passed under Section 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1919

Ram Lal and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-08-1919

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1919All164; 51Ind.Cas.205

Piggott, J.1. This is an application for revision of an order of the Sessions Judge of Jhansi, declining to interfere with an order by a First Class Magistrate of the same district passed under Section 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2002

R.K. Mittal and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-09-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Development Area Act, 1976 - Sections 3, 9(2), 14 and 15; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Development Area (Preparation and Finalisation of Plan) Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 2, 4(1) and 11

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC558; (2002)1UPLBEC444

Advocate for Appellant : Murli Dhar and ;S. Farman Ahmad Naqvi, Advs.

M. Katju, J. 1. This petition furnishes a typical instance of a widespread malady which has infected our society and body politic, namely, the belief in the rich and mighty of our country that they are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1998

Vidya Vinod Alias Chunnulal and Etc. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-10-1998

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 10(7), 13(2), 13(3), 16 and 16(1); Prevention of Food Adulteration (Amendment) Act, 1976; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1985 - Rule 44-A; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1998CriLJ3318

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Sahai, Murli Dhar and;G.N. Shukla, Adv.

ORDERP.K. Jain, J.1.These four criminal revisions raise common question of law which is whether in view of the provisions of Section 16 of the-Prevention of Food Adulteration Act as amended by Amending Act No. 34 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1951

Mohamed Oomer, Mohamed Noorullah Vs. S.M. Noorudin

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-13-1951

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 561 - Order 41, Rules 22 and 23; Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 70, 74, 76 and 77; Trade Marks Rules - Rules 34 and 36

Reported in : AIR1952Bom165; (1952)54BOMLR28

Advocate for Appellant : N.A. Palkhiwalla, Adv.;C.K. Daphtary, Solicitor General

Chagla, C.J.[1] This is an appeal which arises out of an order made by the Register of Trade Marks. The respondent applied for registration of his trade mark on 21-8-1942. The application was advertised on 1-10-1945,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial