Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mukul rohatgi · Page 1 of about 483 results (0.109 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 03 2001

Delhi Bar Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-03-2001

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(6)SCALE41; (2002)10SCC159

B.N. Kirpal,; D.P. Mohapatra and; R.P. Sethi, JJ.1. Mr Mukul Rohatgi, learned Additional Solicitor-General, brings to our notice that there is an order of stay passed by this Court which is hindering the recruitment of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2012

Ms Patel Enginnering Ltd. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-11-2012

Subject : Commercial

Acts : National Highways Authority Act - Section 3 (1) (2) (4); Constitution Of India - Article 298; Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952

Chelameswar, J.1. The National Highways Authority of India (R-2) had decided to undertake development and operation / maintenance of “six laning of Dhankuni - Kharagpur Section of NH-6” in the States of West Bengal and Orissa...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2007

Palitana Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Smt. Vilasiniben Ramachand ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-20-2007

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Gujarat Agricultural Land Ceiling Act, 1960 - Sections 8; Urban Land Ceiling Act - Sections 21 and 21(1); Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 48 - Rule 108(6); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : AIR2007SC1701; 2007(2)AWC1838(SC); JT2007(5)SC83; (2007)3MLJ735(SC); 2007(4)SCALE514

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.,; P.H. Parekh,; Sameer Parekh,;

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. This Court, on 15.10.2004, by a detailed judgment and order passed in Civil Appeal No. 6798 and 6799 of 2004 issued, inter alia, the following directions:73. In the result, we allow the appeals...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 29 2026

Ms Pernod Ricard India Pvt Ltd Through Its Authorised Representative M ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Ninad Laud, Mr. Raj Kamal, Mr. Karan Khanuja, Mr. Zubin Dash, Mr. Harneet Singh, Mr. Kunal Khanuja, Mr. Ishani Shekhar, Mr. Somil Jain, Mr. Dhruv Raman Singh, Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Ms. Avni Singh, Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Mr. Aryaman Vachher, Mr. Vaibhav Sharma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIBEFOREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV+ W.P.(C) 3806/2026Between:M/S PERNOD RICARD INDIA PVT. LTD.12th Floor, Tower B, DLF Cyber Partk, 405-B Sector-20, Udyog Vihar, Phase-III Gurugram - 122016.....PETITIONER(Through: Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2015

Uday Pratap Singh Vs. State and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-19-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. K.Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Panedy, Mr. Ranjeet, Mr. Arunima Pal, Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Chaitali Jain, Mr. Gautam Mitha, Mr. Karan Singh, Mr. K. Raghavacharyulu

$~12, 16, 17, 18 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 2707/2014 THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2015

Global Steel Philippines Vs. State and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-19-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. K.Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Panedy, Mr. Ranjeet, Mr. Arunima Pal, Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Chaitali Jain, Mr. Gautam Mitha, Mr. Karan Singh, Mr. K. Raghavacharyulu

$~12, 16, 17, 18 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 2707/2014 THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2015

the State Trading Corporation of India Ltd Vs. Global Steel Holdings L ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-19-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. K.Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Panedy, Mr. Ranjeet, Mr. Arunima Pal, Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Chaitali Jain, Mr. Gautam Mitha, Mr. Karan Singh, Mr. K. Raghavacharyulu

$~12, 16, 17, 18 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 2707/2014 THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2009

Parmanand Patel (Dead) by Lr. and anr. Vs. Sudha A. Chowgule and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-06-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 283(1); Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2009SC1593; JT2009(4)SC504; (2009)5MLJ157(SC); 2009(3)SCALE922; (2009)11SCC127:2009AIRSCW2496:2009(2)LHSC1054:2009(4)KCCRSN197.; (2009) 11 SCC127

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohatgi,; Anil Divan,; G. Ganesh, Sr. Advs.,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.C.A. No. 11574 of 2009 @ S.L.P. (C) No. 17162 of 2006 2. Parmanand Patel, since deceased, was a very wealthy person. He floated several companies including the 5th respondent Company herein...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2007

Santanu Chaudhuri Vs. Subir Ghosh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-24-2007

Subject : TenancyContempt of Court

Acts : Land Acquisition Act

Reported in : AIR2007SC3144; 2007(6)ALD9(SC); 2007(4)AWC3511(SC); (2007)3CALLT74(SC); JT2007(9)SC356; 2007(9)SCALE334; (2007)10SCC253

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitley and; Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Advs.,; D. Bharat Kumar

J U D G M E N T Contempt Petition (C) No.249 of 2006 In Special Leave Petition (C) No.21766 of 2005 G.P. Mathur, J. 1. This petition has been filed by the landlord Santanu Chaudhuri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2007

Dinesh Dalmia Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-18-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 57, 161, 167, 167(2), 173, 173(2), 173(8), 175(5), 190(1), 309 and 309(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 409, 420, 468 and 471; Constitution of India - Article 22; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act - Sections 20(4)

Reported in : AIR2008SC78; 2008(1)ALD(Cri)331; 2008CriLJ337; JT2007(7)SC164; 2007(11)SCALE228; (2007)8SCC770

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohatgi,; Ranjeet Kumar and; C.M. Nayar, Sr. Advs.,

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of Sub-section (2) of Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') vis--vis Sub-section (2) of Section 309 thereof falls for consideration of this Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial