Advanced Search Results

Knowledge Infrastructure Systems Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Maharashtra Po ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Companies Act, 1956

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohatagi; Mr. Janak Dwarkadas And Ors.

1. Heard.2. Rule.3. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 waive service. Respondent No.3 is a formal party. Respondent No.1 has filed affidavit-in-reply as well as sur-rejoinder affidavit and, therefore, the petition has been heard finally with the consent...

Chatterjee Petrochem Vs. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)143CompCas726

1. "The company is an unlisted company and was originally promoted by WBIDC, CPMC and Tatas to set up Haldia Petrochemical Complex, This project was massive in scale and was intended to be shining example of...

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3453/2002 JINDAL STAINLESS LTD.& ANR. …Appellants VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. …Respondents WITH C.A. No.6383-6421/1997, C.A. No.6422-6435/1997, C.A. No.6436/1997, C.A. No.6437-6440/1997 , C.A. No.3381-3400/1998,...

Modi Rubber Ltd. Vs. Guardian International Corp.

Court : Delhi

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16 and 18; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 82; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 6, 6.1, 9, 11, 17, 18, 19 to 24, 25 and 36; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32, 39 and 56; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 14, 14(1), 16, 21, 23, 41, 41(1) and 42; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 20 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148A - Order 38, Rule 5 - Order 39; LCIA Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 226

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR133(Delhi); 141(2007)DLT822

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitley, Sr. Adv.,; D.S. Narula,; Anis Sharma and;

Gita Mittal, J.1. This petition raises two very interesting questions which are required to be answered. The first question raised is whether a party can seek interim relief on the ground that the other side has...

All India Digital Cable Federation vs Telecom Regulatory Authority of ...

Court : Kerala

W.P.(C) No. 193/2023 :1:IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 193 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S:1 ALL INDIA...

Deepak Maini Vs. Star Plus and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 - Sections 5 and 20; Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994 - Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Programme and Advertising Code

Reported in : 162(2009)DLT352

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Dalal, Adv. in W.P.(C) 10383/2009,; Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv.,;

ORDER1. Present batch of two writ petitions have been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking a ban on telecast of Sach Ka Samna. shows. It has further been prayed that this Court should...

Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd and Anr Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4248 OF2017(Arising out of SLP (C) No.6695 of 2017) CHHATTISGARH STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD AND ANR. ..Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S AMAR INFRASTRUCTURE LTD....

Liberty Sales Service Vs. Jakki Mull and Sons and Shanti Nath Jain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20

Reported in : 2003(39)DRJ673

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohatagi,; P.D. Gupta,; S.K. Manaktala,;

K. Ramamoorthy, J.(1) There is suit No. 885/94 filed by Liberty Sales Service under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act,1940. The Liberty Sales Service filed a suit 264/94 in the lower court. That is withdrawn to...

Baljit Singh Vs. Delhi Administration and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998IAD(Delhi)852; 69(1997)DLT1022

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohatagi,; R.K. Saini,; Jayant Bhushan and;

K. Ramamoorthy, J. (1) The petitioner has prayed for the issuance of writ of certiorari for quashing the letter dated 20.10.1982 by Delhi Administration and the letter dated 25.11.1982 by the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred...

Suraj Besan and Rice Mills Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1988Delhi224; 1987(2)ARBLR240(Delhi); 33(1987)DLT401; 1988(14)DRJ176

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohatagi and; Vijender Jain, Advs

S.N. Sapra, J. (1) Plaintiff has filed the present suit thereby claiming a decree of declaration to the effect that there is no legal, valid and binding contract for the sale and purchase of 6200 M.Ts....