Advanced Search Results
Shiv Kumar and ors. Vs. Collector and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-09-2004
Excise
Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 - Sections 38A; Punjab Excise Act; Uttar Pradesh Excise (Amendment) Act, 1985; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act - Sections 8(1A); Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane Cess Act, 1956 - Sections 3(3); Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Sections 10A; Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 226
2005(1)AWC998
Mukesh Prasad, Adv.
R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners who are four in number, seek the following reliefs :(i) To issue a writ, order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnsuiya, Son of Sri Dulare Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh, Through the ...
Allahabad
May-25-2005
CivilProperty
Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 - Rules 6A and 77; Constitution of India - Article 226
2006(1)AWC279
Mukesh Prasad and ;D.P. Singh, Advs.
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Dev Prakash Singh Advocate on behalf of Raj Bahadur in both the writ petitions, Sri Mukesh Prasad Advocate on behalf of Ansuiya in both the writ petitions and Standing Counsel on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatyendra Kumar Tripathi and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and anr. Etc.
Allahabad
Dec-23-2004
ConstitutionCommercial
Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 4 to 12, 13, 15 and 15(1A); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 15(1), 15(4), 19(1), 19(6), 29, 39 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules, 1963 - Rules 6, 7, 8, 9, 9A, 9(1), 9(2), 9(2)(3), 17, 23, 53 and 53A; Uttar Pradesh Minor Mineral (Concession) (Amendment) Rules, 1983 - Rule 9(2); Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 5A
AIR2005All147
Satya Prakash Singh, ;Gaurab K. Banerji, ;Pankaj Mithal, ;Deo Prakash Singh, ;J.M. Khan, ;R.K. Gupta, ;V.B. Upadhyay and ;Mukesh Prasad, Advs.
A.P. Sahi, J.1. The challenge in the present writ petitions is to the 26th and 27th Amendment Rules introduced in the year 2004 in Uttar Pradesh Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules 1963, whereby preferential rights have been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ratan Kumar Singh Vs. Tahsildar, Sadar, Varanasi and Others
Allahabad
May-26-1999
Excise
Uttar Pradesh Excise Licences (Tender-Cum-Auction) Rules, 1991 - Rules 3, 19, 20(1) and 22; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Constitution of India - Article 226
1999(3)AWC2121
Mukesh Prasad, Adv.
Lakshmi Bihari, J.1. Sri Mukesh Prasad, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri H.R. Mishra, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, have been heard and the record has been perused. With the consent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandra Bhan Singh versus State of Uttar Pradesh & Others
Supreme Court of India
May-23-2025
Land Acquisition
[2025]7S.C.R.94
Ms. Megha Karnwal, Ms. Awantika Manohar, Ms. Mayan Prasad, Ms. Parul Dhurvey, M/s. AP
[2025] 7 S.C.R. 94 : 2025 INSC 763 Chandra Bhan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others (Civil Appeal No. 12314 of 2024) 23 May 2025 [Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masih,* JJ.] Issue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeepak Gupta Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-24-2004
Excise
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Uttar Pradesh Excise Act - Sections 11 and 11(1); Bombay Cinemas Regulation Act, 1953; Bombay Cinema Rules, 1954 - Rule 4
2005(1)AWC893
V.C. Mishra and ;Vivek Mishra, Advs.
R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Deepak Gupta, seeks the following reliefs :'(a) issue a writ order or direction in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. Vs. Ram Kishan
Allahabad
Sep-06-2012
Education
Sri. Mukesh Prasad
1. This is defendants' appeal against judgment and decree dated 28th April, 1998 passed by Sri J.P. Pandey, Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffarnagar in O.S. No.143 of 1995, decreeing the suit, declaring that the amount recovered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMan Mohan Anand and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-30-2008
Property
2008(2)AWC1121
Shri. Mukesh Prasad
V.M. Sahai and R.N. Misra, JJ.1. The short question that arises for our consideration in this petition is whether the period of 90 days has to be counted w.e.f. 15.5.2003, the date on which the notice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunder Lal Son of Sri Dukhi Lal and Prem Swarup Son of Sri Bhoop NaraI ...
Allahabad
Jul-06-2007
Commercial
2007(4)AWC4061
Shri. L.K. Dwivedi
R.K. Agrawal, J. 1. In all these writ petitions the petitioners have challenged the vires of Rule 14 of the Uttar Pradesh Excise (Settlement of Licences for Retail Sale of Country Liquor) Rules, 2001 (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajesh Kumar Tiwari Son of B.D. Tiwari Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh,
Allahabad
Jul-06-2007
Excise
2008(1)AWC233
Sri. Mukesh Prasad
R.K. Agrawal, J.1. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 584 of 1999 has been filed by Rajesh Kumar Tiwari whereas Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 585 of 1999 has been filed by B.D. Tiwari wherein identical relief...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »