Advanced Search Results
Sondur Rajini Vs. Sondur Gopal
Mumbai
Apr-11-2005
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 1, 1(2), 2, 2(3), 10, 19, 19(1) and 19(2); The Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 2003; Divorce Act, 1860 - Sections 10; Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act, 1973 - Sections 1; Indian Succession Act - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 188; Hindu Law; Private International Law; Indian Law; Constitution of India - Article 5; Indian Penal Code
2005(4)MhLj688
Y.H. Muchhala, Adv., ;i/b., Tushar Goradia and ;H. Nikumb, Advs.
D.B. Bhosale, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Admit. Ms. Nagarathn, learned counsel, waives service for the respondent. By consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, taken up for final hearing.2. This...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.V. BhasIn Vs. State of Maharashtra and Marine Drive Police Station
Mumbai
Jan-06-2010
Criminal
Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867; Bombay Police Act - Sections 59; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 4(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 124A, 153, 153A, 153B, 292, 293, 295A, 301 and 505; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 95, 95(1), 96, 96(4), 99A, 99C, 144, 468 and 473; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 99A and 99D; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(2) and 226
2010(112)BomLR154
J.P. Cama, Sr. Counsel and ;R.J. Cama, Adv., i/b., R.V. Bhasin, Adv.;Y.H. Muchhala, Sr. Counsel, ;Amin Solkar, ;Shaikh Yakub and ;Mubin Solkar, Advs., i/b., Judicial Law & Associates for Interveno
Ranjana Desai, J.1. Rule. Respondents waive service. With the consent of the parties and at the request of the counsel, taken up for hearing.2. The applicant, who is an advocate, is the author of a book...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Iqbal and ors. Vs. His Holiness Dr. Syedna Mohd. BarhanuddIn Saha ...
Rajasthan
Jan-20-1992
Civil
1992(2)WLC137; 1992(1)WLN511
Mr. L.R. Mehta, Mr. Y.H. Muchhala
N.K. Jain, J. 1. These are defendants' appeals against the order dt. 14.11.91 passed by the learned District Judge, Udaipur whereby he has allowed the plaintiffs' application dt. 20.5.85 for grant of temporary injunction under Order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Noorjahan Wdlo Altaf Ahmed and ors. Vs. Sadrunnisa Wdlo Haji Fatehulla ...
Mumbai
Nov-23-1992
Civil
1993(1)BomCR501; (1993)95BOMLR834
Y.H. Muchhala, R.K. Sarguroh and ;Bhargavram, Advs.
S.M. Jhunjhunwala, J.1. In the month of December ,1984, the plaintiffs have filed this suit for administration of the estate of one Haji Fatehulla Khan son of Talib Khan who died intestate at Fatehpur (U.P.) on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPravIn R. Geglani Vs. Beharilal Beniprasad Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai
Aug-01-1977
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(4), 9, 19, 20, 44A and 44A(1) - Order 21, Rule 22; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 4 and 12; Copyright Act - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(2); Calcutta City Civil Courts Act - Sections 5
AIR1978Bom255; (1978)80BOMLR64; 1978MhLJ641
Y.H. Muchhala, Adv.
1. This is an appeal by the original plaintiff in suit No. 172 of 1970 on the file of the Supreme Court of Aden, against the order of the learned Judge of the City Civil Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Gujarat Vs. i.r.c.g.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-29-2017
Land Acquisition
Hemantika Wahi
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3249 OF2016State of Gujarat and Another … Appellant(s) Versus The I.R.C.G. and Others …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, CJI The present appeal, by special...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAxis Bank Ltd., vs the State of Karnataka by
Karnataka
Feb-25-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 295 OF 2025 BETWEEN: AXIS BANK LTD., A BANKING COMPANY, CARRYING...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLily Thomas, Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-05-2000
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 11, 13, 17 and 18; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 494 and 495; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 40, Rule 1; Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act, 1937; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 198; Matrimonial Causes Act - Sections 12; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976; Supreme Court Rules - Rule 1; Constitution of India, Articles 13, 20(1), 21, 25, 26, 32, 136, 137 and 145; Indian Divorce Act - Sections 61
2000(2)ALD(Cri)686; 2000(3)ALLMR(SC)251; 2000(1)ALT(Cri)363; 2001(1)BLJR499; 2000CriLJ2433; II(2000)DMC1SC; JT2000(5)SC617; 2000(4)SCALE176; (2000)6SCC224; 2000(2)LC1113(SC; [2000] 3 SCR 1081
ORDERS. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. I respectfully agree with the views expressed by my esteemed Brother, Sethi, J., in the erudite judgment prepared by him, by which the Writ Petitions and the Review Petition are being disposed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLal Shah Baba Dargah Trust Vs. Magnum Developers and Others
Supreme Court of India
Dec-15-2015
Land Acquisition
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.14565 OF2015(Arising out of SLP(C) No.29234/2015) LAL SHAH BABA DARGAH TRUST Appellant (s) versus MAGNUM DEVELOPERS AND OTHERS Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.14566 OF2015(Arising...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSondur Gopal Vs. Sondur Rajini
Supreme Court of India
Jul-15-2013
Land Acquisition
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4629 OF 200.SONDUR GOPAL APPELLANT VERSUS SONDUR RAJINI RESPONDENT With CIVIL APPEAL NO.487 OF 200.RAJINI SONDUR APPELLANT VERSUS GOPAL SONDUR & ORS. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »