Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ms s i shah · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.205 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 28 2005

Apollo Paper Mills Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-28-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17, 111 and 155

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR108; (2005)107BOMLR683

Advocate for Appellant : Soli Sorabjee, Sr. Counsel and ;Amit Pawan, ;J.P. Dhanuka, ;K.R. Dhanuka and ;Bhupendra Singh, Advs.

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. Why the petitioner should be saddled with the warehousing charges for the inordinate delay on the part of the Customs authorities in finalising the assessment of the goods imported by the petitioner. In...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2013

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-11-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

NON- REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5428 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP(C) No.3009/2012) Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited …Appellant versus State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents JUDGMENT G. S. SINGHVI,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2002

Kishor Mahadeo Kamble Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-18-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1)

Reported in : (2003)ILLJ813Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Jaiprakash Sawant, Adv.

1. Rule. Returnable forthwith.2. Mr. Dubey, advocate waives service for respondent No. 1 and Ms. S.I. Shah, advocate waives service for respondent No. 2.3. Rule is heard finally at this stage.4. The petitioner is aggrieved by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 14 1996

Union of India Vs. Shyama Charan Agarwala and Sons

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-14-1996

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : (1996)22BOMLR169

Advocate for Appellant : Sh. Suraj M. Shah and ;Ms. S.I. Shah, Adv., i/b., ;S. Bhattacharya

S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners seek to have the Award dated 30th August, 1994 filed in this court and numbered as Award No. 233 of 1994 set aside. 2. On 20th Oct., 1987,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1997

Union of India Vs. Devidas Construction

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-09-1997

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR381

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. S.I. Shah, Govt. Adv.

V.R. Datar, J.1. The Union of India through Executive Engineer, Department of Telecommunications, Civil Wing, Sion, Bombay, has filed this petition under Section 30 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 for setting aside the award made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1997

Union of India Through Executive Engineer, Dept. of Telecommunication ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-09-1997

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30

Reported in : 1998(2)BomCR424

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. S.I. Shah, Adv.

ORDERV.R. Datar, J.1. The Union of India through Executive Engineer, Department of Telecommunications, Civil Wing, Sion, Bombay, has filed this petition under section 30 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 for setting aside the award made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1999

Union of India Vs. M/S. Build-India Construction Systems

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-21-1999

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(1 and 2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 119 - Schedule - Articles 119 and 158

Reported in : 1999(3)ALLMR638; 1999(4)BomCR719; (1999)3BOMLR490

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Shah and ;Ms. S.I. Shah, Advs.

ORDERS. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Leave under Rule 127 of the High Court, Original Side, Rules is granted to the petitioner to take out the Chamber Summons in terms of the draft Chamber Summons. Chamber Summons is made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1997

Manilal Govindji Khona Vs. Indian Bank

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-05-1997

Subject : Banking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : 1998(1)ALLMR285; 1998(3)BomCR182

Advocate for Appellant : N.G. Thakkar, ;T.G. Vora and ;Ms. S.I. Shah, Advs.

1. The appeal impugns the order dated 1st August, 1997, which refused to grant any ad-interim Relief.2. In a suit filed by the Bank for recovery of a large amount, by order dated 9th December, 1996,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial