Advanced Search Results
Kisan Yeshwant Dhirade Vs. Sonabai Bappu Lohar and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-18-2001
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 2(6), 15, 31, 33B, 34, 37 and 37(1); Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1956
2001VIIIAD(SC)52; 2001(6)SCALE563; (2001)9SCC141; [2001]3SCR95; 2001(2)LC1552(SC)
Ms. Promila,; Ms. Anuradha Rustogi and; T. Raja, Advs
ORDER1. The appellant is the dissatisfied tenant who parted with the possession of agricultural land bearing Survey No. 250, measuring acres 13 guntas 5 situated at Belpimpaltaon Taluq, Newasa, Distt. Ahmednagar. He is appeal before us,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSelvakumar Vs. Manjula
Supreme Court of India
Sep-19-2022
Land Acquisition
S. THANANJAYAN __
1 NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs. _16031604 OF2022ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL) NOs. 86838684 OF2019SELVAKUMAR ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MANJULA & ANR. ..RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT1 Leave granted.2. This appeal by Accused...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of H.P. Vs. Nirmala Devi
Supreme Court of India
Apr-10-2017
Land Acquisition
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.OF2017[Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.8983 of 2012]. |STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH |.....APPELLANT(S) | | | | |VERSUS | | |NIRMALA DEVI |.....RESPONDENT(S) |...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramkripal S/O Shyamlal Charmakar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Mar-19-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 122, 354, 375, 376, 399 and 511
2007CriLJ2302; JT2007(4)SC393; 2007(I)OLR(SC)803; 2007(4)SCALE438; 2007AIRSCW2198; (2007)3Crimes115(SC)
Promila, Adv. (A.C.
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur, dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParnav Tyagi Vs. the State of Haryana and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-09-2014
Land Acquisition
CWP No.5638 of 2014 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.5638 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision:- 09.07.2014 Parnav Tyagi ......Petitioner...versus The State of Haryana and others ......Respondents...CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPresent: Mr. Rahul Rampal Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-23-2014
Criminal
Crl. Misc. No.M-5318 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-5318 of 2014 Date of decision : 23.07.2014 Durga Parshad Jaiswal ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and another...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGurdip Singh Vs. Unknown
Punjab and Haryana
May-10-2013
Education
Cr.Misc. M11657 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M11657 of 2013 Date of decision:10. 5.2013 Gurdip Singh .petitioner vs State of Punjab ..respondent Present Ms.Promila Nain, Advocate....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDate of Decision: April 2, 2013 Vs. State of Punjab and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-02-2013
Land Acquisition
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.26229 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.26229 of 2012 DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 2 2013 Court on its own motion .......Petitioner Versus State of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.L. Dogra and Another Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-08-2013
Education
CRM-M-15389-2013 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15389-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 8, 2013 R.L. Dogra and another …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBal Raj Aggarwal Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority
Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Mar-14-2007
Land Acquisition
K.C. Gupta, President: 1. Briefly stated the facts are that Industrial Plot No. 9-A measuring 990.40 sq. mtrs situated in Industrial Area, Phase-II, Panchkula was allotted to the complainant Sh. Bal Raj Aggarwal on 6.4.1995 through...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »