Advanced Search Results

Basant Mayaramka Vs. Registrar Co-operative Societies and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Delhi Co-operative Societies Rules, 1973 - Sections 36; Delhi Co-operative Societies Act - Sections 60 and 76; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)634

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Pinky Anand, Adv

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J.1. Rule.With the consent of parties, the writ petition is taken up for disposal.2. Petitioner by this writ petition seeks a direction for calling of records an quashing the impugned orders dated 19.91994 and...

Rajnish Gupta and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IIIAD(Delhi)725; 80(1999)DLT481

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Pinky Anand and; Mr. Shiv Kant Arora, Advs

ORDERCW. 528/99. 1. The 51 petitioners, who are senior officers of Delhi Police, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Daman & Deo and are commonly known as DANIPS officers, have approached this Court in this writ petition seeking...

Rajnish Gupta and ors. Vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi and Others.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2000IAD(Delhi)455; 83(2000)DLT229; 2000(52)DRJ326

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Pinki Anand,; Mr. D. Goverdhan and; Mr. A.K. Behra,

ORDERN.G. Nandi, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, who are the senior personnels of Delhi Police, known as DA- NIPS, pray for the implementation of the order of...

Saeeda M.A. Saeed Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; COFEPOSA Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1999IIAD(Delhi)481; 1999CriLJ1796; 78(1999)DLT463; 1999(49)DRJ245

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Sangeeta Bhayana, Adv; Ms. Pinki Anand and; Mr. Manish

ORDERD.K. Jain, J.1.Rule D.B. 2. In this habeas corpus writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the order made by and in the name of Lt. Governor of National Capital...

Padam Prasad Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 191 (1) (d), 226; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005; Representation of People Act, 1951; Registration of Electors Rules, 1960; Citizenship Rules, 1956 - Rule 2 of Schedule III

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Pinky Anand; Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the order? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes ORDERIntroduction1. Stating that he...

Agricultural Produce Market Committee Vs. Pholu and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1155

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Pinky Anand, Adv

ORDERKhan, J.1. It is all about a wall proposed to be constructed by petitioner on the road starting from G.T. Karnal Road up to New Azadpur Railway Station. Petitioner claims it to be part and parcel...

Capricorn One and anr. Vs. Shri Raghbir Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)810; 80(1999)DLT639; 1999(50)DRJ626

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Pinki Anand, Adv

ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1.This is an application for amendment of the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The later half of this Rule makes it mandatory for allowing that all amendments...

Asa Ram and Another Vs. M.C.D. and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39 and 33; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 63 and 114; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Reported in : 1996ACJ20; 1994IVAD(Delhi)365; AIR1995Delhi164; 56(1994)DLT441

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Pinky Anand and; Ms. Geeta Luthra, Advs

ORDER1. Sh. Asa Ram and another, by this suit, against the M.C.D. and others, have sought recovery of Rs. 4 lacs as damages on account of the death of their son Karan Singh, which according to...

Indira Jaising Vs. Supreme Court of India Through Secretary General .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Anindita Pujari

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) No.454 OF2015MS. INDIRA JAISING ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY GENERAL AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH T.C. (C) No.1 of 2017,...

National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms Joint ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Mathews J. Nedumpara

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) No.454 OF2015MS. INDIRA JAISING ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY GENERAL AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH T.C. (C) No.1 of 2017,...