Advanced Search Results
Smt. Madhu Maheshwari Vs. Cit
Rajasthan
Apr-16-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]131TAXMAN457(Raj)
P.K. Kasliwal, for the Assessee Ms. Parinitoo Jain, for the Revenue
ORDERThis appeal has been admitted in terms of the following questions:'1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that Circular No. 648, dated 30-3-1993...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Balu Ram
Rajasthan
May-23-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]133TAXMAN71(Raj)
Ms. Parinitoo Jain, for the Revenue
ORDEROn an application under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following question for the opinion of this court :'Whether on the proper interpretation and in construction of the Voluntary...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSita Ram Rameshwar Prasad Vs. Cit
Rajasthan
Jul-11-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]133TAXMAN655(Raj)
Anuroop Singhi and Mahendra Gargia, for the Assessee Ms. Parinitoo Jain, for the Revenue
ORDERHeard learned counsel for the parties.2. On an application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act. Tribunal has referred the following question for the opinion of this court:-'Whether on the facts and in the circumstances...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Madhu Maheshwari Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.
Rajasthan
Apr-16-2003
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 56 and 57
(2003)183CTR(Raj)429; [2004]267ITR176(Raj)
P.K. Kasliwal, Adv.
1. This appeal has been admitted in terms of the following questions :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that Circular No. 648, dt....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSamurai Software (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Rajasthan
Oct-26-2007
Direct Taxation
[2008]299ITR324(Raj); (2007)213TTJ(NULL)449
R.M. Lodha, J.1. The only contention raised by the counsel for the appellant assessee company in challenging the order of the Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur dt. 10th June, 2002 is that if the Tribunal is held...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Raj Kumar Sharma
Rajasthan
Apr-30-2007
Direct Taxation
[2007]294ITR131(Raj)
1. We heard Ms. Parinitoo Jain for the Revenue and Mr. P.K. Kasliwal counsel for the assessee.That the assessee acted in contravention of the provisions of Section 269SS of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by accepting a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Birla Cement Works Vs. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commissio ...
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Feb-13-2015
Electricity
Sunil Ambwani, Actg. C.J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Mr.Bipin Gupta appears for Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ms.Parinitoo Jain for Ajmer Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited, Ajmer. 2. The appellants are industrial consumers...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagdish Prasad and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-06-2003
Civil
Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 - Sections 72; Rajasthan Municipalities (Motion of No Confidence against the Chairman and Vice Chairman) Rules, 1974 - Rule 3(1)
RLW2003(2)Raj1033; 2003(2)WLC626
Rathore, J. 1. Present petition is directed against the order dated 21.6.2002 passed by the District Collector, Bharatpur and against the notice dated 21.6.2002 also issued by District Collector, Bharatpur. 2. Brief facts of the case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajshree Roadways Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
Mar-28-2003
PropertyDirect Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37(1)
(2003)181CTR(Raj)467; [2003]263ITR206(Raj)
A. Kasliwal, Adv.
1. Since all the three appeals involve common question of law, the same are being decided by the common judgment.2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›