Advanced Search Results
Ats Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Cit
Delhi
May-27-2009
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64(1), 64(2), 64(3), 124, 127 and 127(2); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 11; Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 7; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 2
(2009)226CTR(Del)457; [2009]318ITR299(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN486(Delhi)
C.S. Aggarwal; Anil Kher, Sr. Advs.; Prakash Kumar; Kapil Kher an; S.S. Pandit, Advs
Vikramajit Sen, J.1. This is the second salvo of the Petitioners seeking to invoke extraordinary of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Petitioners challenge the transfer of their cases from Delhi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Bharat Alumunium Co. Ltd.
Delhi
Oct-15-2009
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(11), 3.5D, 31(1), 32, 32(1), 37, 41, 41(2), 43, 43B, 80HHC, 82, 139(1) and 254; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2); Income Tax Act, 1986; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Income Tax Rules - Rule 5 and 5(2); Income Tax (Amendment) Act
[2010]187TAXMAN111(Delhi)
A.K. Sikri, J.1. All these appeals are filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the same assessee, viz., Bharat Aluminum Company Ltd. There are various common issues, which have arisen in these appeals relating to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsian Center for Organization Research and Development Vs. Deputy Dire ...
Delhi
Feb-17-2009
Direct Taxation
[2009]180TAXMAN175(Delhi)
Avnish Ahlawat an; Saurabh Chaddha, Advs
ORDER1. The Writ Petition is vehemently opposed by Ms. P.L. Bansal, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the revenue, on the ground that alternative remedy is available to the petitioner. According to the learned Counsel the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ankitech Pvt Ltd. and ors.
Delhi
May-11-2011
Income Tax
Income Tax Act - Sections 2(22)(e), 115JB, 8
1. In all these appeals, same questions of law touching the interpretation that is to be accorded to the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the amount received by the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd.
Delhi
Nov-29-2010
Direct Taxation
Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Adv.
1. Though various questions of law were proposed in this appeal, the appeal was admitted on the following substantial questions of law: "(i) Whether ITAT was correct in law in allowing provision made by the assessee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Thirani Chemicals Ltd.
Delhi
Dec-01-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)204CTR(Del)146; [2006]155TAXMAN233(Delhi)
Ms. P.L. Bansal and; Vishnu Sharma,;for the Appellant; None
T.S. Thakur, J.The assessed-company, in order to modernize and expand its activities and with a view to augment its long-term capital requirements, raised funds to the extent of Rs. 406.65 lacs during the relevant accounting year...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. M.G.F. (India) Ltd.
Delhi
Jul-05-2006
Direct Taxation
[2006]285ITR142(Delhi)
Ms. P.L. Bansal and;Vishnu Shanna &; Rajeev Awasthy,;for the assessed;O.S. Bajpai &;
The revenue is aggrieved by an order dated 27-4-2000, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'A', New Delhi in I.T.A. No. 4915/Delhi of 1999 relevant for the assessment year 1996-97.2. The assessed is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Itat and ors.
Delhi
Jun-02-2006
Direct Taxation
(2005)204CTR(Del)349; [2006]155TAXMAN378(Delhi); 196ITR641
Ms. P.L. Bansal,;for the Revenue; V.K. Jain,;for the Respondent
T.S. Thakur, J.:Issue rule. With consent, this writ petition has been heard for final disposal.2. The petitioner has in this petition assailed the validity of an order passed by the Tribunal under section 254 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Digvijay Chemicals Ltd.
Delhi
Apr-04-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)204CTR(Del)234; [2007]294ITR359(Delhi)
Ms. P.L. Bansal,;for the Appellant; Dhruv Aggarwal,;for the Respondent
T.S. Thakur, J.A preliminary objection has been raised on behalf of the respondent-assessed to the maintainability of the present appeal in this Court. It was argued by Mr. Aggarwal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirector of Income Tax Vs Pradan Property Holding Trust.
Delhi
Aug-16-2010
Land Acquisition
Ms.P.L. Bansal, Adv
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?J U D G M E N T1.The issue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »