Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ms hima kohli · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.048 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 23 2024

M/s. Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Ltd. Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigatio ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-23-2024

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : ROOH-E-HINA DUA __

REPORTABLE2024INSC623IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1659-1660 OF2024M/S. KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED AND ANOTHER ..…APPELLANTS Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION …..RESPONDENT INDEX S. No.Details Paras No.Page No.1. A. PREFACE12 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2004

Tanvi Trading and Credit Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. New Delhi Municipal Co ... Overruled

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; New Delhi Municipal Council Act - Sections 235, 241, 241(1), 241(2), 242 and 386

Reported in : 112(2004)DLT1

Advocate for Appellant : Lala Ram Gupta, Sr. Adv. and; Manish Vashisht, Adv

Vijender Jain, J.1. Rule D.B.The case of the petitioner is that on 28.10.1994, the petitioner purchased a plot of land bearing No. 47, Amrita Shergil Marg, New Delhi measuring 5000 sq. yards through a registered sale...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2003

Shri A.B.A. Ghani Khan Chowdhary Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-07-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Electricity Act

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)84; 105(2003)DLT741; 2003(70)DRJ1

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Paul, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. The petitioner Shri A.B.A. Ghani Khan Chaudhary, a former Cabinet Minister and a Member of Parliament has filed the present writ petition seeking to quash impugned demand vide letter No. 186-EE(Comm)/LOPH dated 29th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 08 2019

Faeem vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-08-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sumeet Verma, Mr. Satyam Sharma

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 980/2004 and Crl.M.A.9483/2009 IN THE MATTER OF: FAEEM STATE Date of Decision:08. 01.2019 ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Sumeet Verma & Mr. Satyam Sharma,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2003

Sunil Jhakar Vs. State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur

Court : DRAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : III(2004)BC209

1. First respondent-State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent-Bank') filed O.A. 287/96 on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'the DRT") against (1) M/s. B.R....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 1997

Frank Educational Aids Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Fair Deal Marketing

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-20-1997

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 1997(42)DRJ231

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitley,; Hema Kohli,; Ajay Sawhney and;

S.N. Kapoor, J. (1) This order relates to is 5075/97 under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code seeking ad interim injunction restraining the defendants themselves, their servants, agents, shop-keepers,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2005

Greater Kailash Welfare Association and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-18-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Cinematograph Act, 1952; Delhi Development Act - Sections 53A, 53A(1), 53A(2) and 53 (2); Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 332, 339 and 347; Finance Act, 1972; Delhi Cinematograph (Amendment) Rules, 2002 - Rule 3(2) and 3(3); Delhi Cinematograph Rules, 1981 - Rules 11 and 16(2); Delhi Control of Vehicular and Other Traffic and Road Street Regulations, 1980 - Regulation 3(1) and 3(2); Delhi Development Authority Regulations; Delhi Development Regulations; Delhi Development Rules; Delhi Master Plan Development Code, 2001; Development Control Rules

Reported in : 124(2005)DLT550; 2005(85)DRJ674

Advocate for Appellant : Vipin Sanghi and; Sunil Magon, Advs

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. In these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seek a quashing order, in respect of the sanction of the building plans for alteration/ conversion of the existing building into...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2006

All India Young Lawyers Association (Regd) Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi a ... Overruled

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-24-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Superior Judicial Services Rules - Rules 16, 26(B) and 26(B)(1); Constitution of India - Articles 234 and 235

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT29; 2006(87)DRJ704

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Khanna, Adv

Vijender Jain, J. 1. Rule D.B.2. All India Young Lawyers' Association (Registered) has filed this writ petition in public interest to espouse the cause of direct recruits to Delhi Higher Judicial service. The prayer made in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2003

Saurabh Prakash Vs. Samir Prakash

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-03-2003

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 25 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 19, Rule 1 - Order 23, Rule 3 - Order 32A, Rules 3 and 5; Army Act - Sections 14 and 130

Reported in : 109(2004)DLT817; 2004(73)DRJ63

Advocate for Appellant : Party in perso

Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. Vide Order dated 29.10.2003, the prayer made by the defendant that the undersigned should consider recusing himself from the case, was declined for reasons to follow. Now I proceed to give reasons.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 1998

i. Kovoor (Retd.)(Wg. Cdr.) Vs. Mahalakshmi Land and Finance

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-1998

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 21(5)

Reported in : 1998(45)DRJ113

Advocate for Appellant : : Ms. Hima Kohli, Adv.

Dr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 30.11.1995 passed by the learned Single Judge in IAs 1495, 1496, 8487 all of 1994 and 8346/1995 in Suit No.1763/1984. By the aforesaid...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial