Advanced Search Results
Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Chennai
Sep-15-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN812(Mad)
Ramachandran for the Assessee Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Revenue.
P.D. Dinakaran J.Both these appeals are preferred by the assessee. T.C. (A) No. 300 of 2001 is with reference to the assessment year 1991-92 and T.C. (A) No. 41 of 2002 is with reference to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. Vs. Cit and ors.
Chennai
Jan-28-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]261ITR63(Mad)
V. Ramachandran for Anita Sumanth, for the Assessee Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Revenue
P.K. Misra J.Heard Mr. V. Ramachandran, learned senior counsel, for the petitioner, and Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman for the respondents.2. The petitioner has prayed for quashing the order bearing G. I. No. 4-S of 1995-96 and 1996-97,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDxn Herbal Manufacturing India (P) Ltd. Vs. Ito and ors.
Chennai
Apr-05-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)204CTR(Mad)378
V. Ramachandran, for the Assessee Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Revenue
ORDERK. Mohan Ram, J. When WP Nos. 9539 and 9540 of 2006 came up for admission today, Mrs. P.S. Pushya Sitaraman, learned senior counsel standing counsel for the Income Tax Department took notice for the respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cit T. Nadu-i Vs. V. Pradeep Kumar
Chennai
Apr-19-2006
Direct Taxation
[2006]153TAXMAN138(Mad)
Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Assessee R. Venkataraman, for the Revenue.
P.P.S. Janarthana Raja, J. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, 'A' Bench, referred the following question of law at the instance of revenue, under the direction of this court in TCP Nos. 77 & 78 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Simpson and General Finance Co. Ltd. (N ...
Chennai
Jan-30-2006
Direct Taxation
[2006]285ITR431(Mad)
Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Revenue.
P.D. Dinakaran, J.The tax case Appeals Nos. 1452 to 1455 of 2005 are directed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in M.P. Nos. 188 to 191/Mds/2004 in W.T.A. Nos. 258 to 261/Mds/96 dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRanga Rao Lottery Agencies Vs. Cit
Chennai
Feb-09-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)201CTR(Mad)431; [2006]155TAXMAN422(Mad)
P.P.S. Janarthana Raja for Subbaraya Aiyar, for the Assessee Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Revenue.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.In all these cases, the Tribunal, at the instance of the assessee, has stated a case and referred the following common questions of law for consideration by this court :'1. Whether, on the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Best and Crompton Engg. Ltd.
Chennai
Jan-03-2006
Direct Taxation
[2006]156TAXMAN216(Mad)
Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Appellant.
P.P.S. Janarthana Raja, J. At the instance of the revenue, the Tribunal has referred the following question of law arising out of the order dated 11-9-1997 in ITA No. 2158/Mds/1990 for the opinion of this Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. G.V. Venugopal
Chennai
Dec-06-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN784(Mad)
Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the revenue None, for the Assessee
The Honourable The Chief Justice)This appeal is filed under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras C Bench.2. Heard the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Associated Electrical Agencies
Chennai
Dec-08-2003
Direct Taxation
[2004]135TAXMAN12(Mad)
Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman for the Revenue V. Ramachandran & Devendiran for the Assessee.
R. Jayasimha Babu, J.The assessment year is 1992-93. The questions referred to us for consideration are :-'1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTitanium Equipment and Anode Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Chennai
Jul-27-2005
Direct Taxation
[2005]278ITR565(Mad); [2005]150TAXMAN188(Mad)
P.P.S. Janarthana Raja, for the Assessee. Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Revenue.
Markandey Katju, C.J.These two appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are being disposed of by a common judgment.In both these appeals one common question of law involved is whether the Tribunal was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »