Advanced Search Results

Khemraj Hiralal Agarwal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 306 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR347; 1995CriLJ2271

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Anita Agarwal and;S.G. Deshmukh, Advs.

1. The appellant aggrieved by the order dated 30-11-1987 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 285 of 1987, convicting him under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC, and awarding him a composite...

Shri Ravi Somnath Chavan Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302, 304-II and 307; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 9, 45, 59 and 61; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 165, 235 and 313;

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR554; 1999CriLJ4234

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Anita A. Agarwal, Adv.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this appeal the appellant challenges the judgment and order dated 17th January, 1994, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 734 of 1991, convicting and sentencing him...

All India Naval Stenographers Association and Others Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : Mrs. Anita Swain. Counsel for the Respondents : M. Brahma Reddy, Sr. P.C. for CG D.Y. Setty, SC for State of A.P.

ORAL ORDER ( HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. LAKSHMANA REDDY, VICE-CHAIRMAN.) Heard Mr. Krishna Swamy, learned counsel representing Mrs. Anita Swain, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. M. Brahma Reddy, Senior Penal Counsel for Central Government...

Manikraj Devraj Moharkar Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 255, 260, 261, 268, 415, 420 and 468; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 165; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 45, 47 and 61

Reported in : 1998BomCR(Cri)663; (1998)1BOMLR653

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Anita A. Agarwal, Adv.

ORDERV.H. Bhairavia, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order date 31-10-1990, passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 594 of 1988, whereby, the appellant-accused has been convicted for...

M/S. Muktadevi Krushi Seva Kendra, District – Pune and Another Vs ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Anita Marathe, Advocate for Appellant, holding for Advocate J.M. Baphana Mr. V.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

Per Shri S.R. Khanzode, Honble Presiding Judicial Member 1) This appeal arises out of order/award dated 30/09/1998 passed in Consumer complaint No.APDF/153/1997, Santosh G.Waghmare V/s. M/s.Kuktadevi Krushi Seva Kendra and Others passed by Additional District Consumer...

Deputy Cit Vs. Triveni Engineering Works Ltd..

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)88TTJ(Del)165

ORDERS.K. Yadav, J.M.This appeal is preferred on behalf of the revenue against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) pertaining to the assessment year 1991-92 on a solitary ground that he has erred in interpreting the provisions...

Atmaram Mahadeo Gaikwad Vs. Muktabai Tamaram Gaikwad and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 500; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 202 and 397

Reported in : 1997(3)ALLMR658(1); 1998BomCR(Cri)448

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Anita A. Agarwal, Adv.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Heard Mrs. Anita A. Agarwal for the petitioner and Mrs. Jyoti S. Pawar for respondent No. 3, respondents Nos. 1 and 2 have been served but have not engaged any Counsel.2. By means...

J.H. Tarapore Vs. Cit

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)176CTR(Mad)559

Advocate for Appellant : V. Ramachandran for Mrs. Anita Sumanth, for the Assessee T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Revenue

By the CourtThe question referred at the instance of the assessee is as follows :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the sum...

Devi Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983WLN(UC)311

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. M.S. Singhvi

M.C. Jain, J.1. Five accused persons namely, Devi Singh, Laxman Singh, Phakira, Manak Chand and Karni Dan, were tried by the Sessions Judge, Churu, for the offences Under Sections 395, 294 323 and 341, IPC. However,...

Dk Warehouse Pvt. Ltd. Vs.brainbridge Advertising and Marketing Pvt. L ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Parul Bose, Ms. Anita Jain

* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 05.2016 Pronounced on:16. 03.2017 CO.APP.50/2013 & C.M. NOS. 11516/2013 & 11518/2013 VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR KAPOOR AND ORS. Versus...