Advanced Search Results

C. J. International Hotels Ltd. Vs.new Delhi Municipal Council

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 02.2018 + W.P.(C) 1703/2018 & C.M. No.7036/2018 C.J.INTERNATIONAL HOTELS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr.H.S. Chandhoke, Ms.Shweta Kakkad,...

Ranbir Sharma Vs. Through: Mr.B.S.Maan, Mr.Amit

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: November 04 , 2011 Pronounced on: January 06, 2012 (GRID-A) + LA.APP.1195/2008 (VILLAGE- BHARTHAL) RANBIR SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.B.S.Maan, Mr.Amit Maan, Mr.Jai...

Senjil Gupta vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: January 25, 2019 + O.REF. 1/2017 SENJIL GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitender Choudhary, Adv. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms....

Mohd Sageer vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Renu, Ms. Mansi, Mr. Momin, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1351/2026 & CM APPL. 6701/2026, CM APPL. 6702/2026 MOHD SAGEER .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Renu, Ms Mansi, Mr Momin and Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra,...

ishwar Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Virendra Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. REV. P. 675/2009 % Reserved on: 17th January , 2012 Decided on: 8th February, 2012 ISHWAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocate...

Raju Gupta vs Town Vending Committee and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Aditya, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Anjani Kr Mishra, Mr. Kailash Kr Jha, Ms. Pralika Chakraborty, Mr. Fareeduddin, Ms. Srejal Mishra

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5514/2026 RAJU GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Anjani Kr Mishra, Mr. Kailash Kr Jha, Ms. Pralika Chakraborty, Mr. Fareeduddin and Ms....

Sheetal Gupta vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Aditya, Mr. Anjani Kr. Mishra, Mr. Kailash Kr Jha, Ms. Pralika Chakraborty, Mr. Fareeduddin, Ms. Srejal Mishra, Ms. Puja, Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Mr. Siddharth Arora, Mr. Akhil Mitta, Ms. Riddhi Jain, Ms. Shayna Das Pattanayak

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 16th April, 2026 Uploaded on: 18th April, 2026 + W.P.(C) 5053/2026 SHEETAL GUPTA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya, Mr. Anjani Kr. Mishra, Vipin Kr., Mr....

Raj Kumar Alias Rajesh Kumar and Ors. vs the State Govt Nct of Delhi a ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Virendra Singh, Mr. Raj Kumar, Mr. Nand Kishor

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 05th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 45/2026 RAJ KUMAR ALIAS RAJESH KUMAR AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocate with petitioner in person.versusTHE...

Kshetriya Shri Gandhi Ashram and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2K

Reported in : (1994)IIILLJ598All

Advocate for Appellant : H.S.N. Tripathi, Adv. and ;H.C. Awasthi, Counsel

B.L.Yadav, J. 1. Petitioner Kshetriya Shri Gandhi Ashram, Maghar, a charitable institution registered under the Societies Registration Act 29 of 1860 has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution with the prayer to...

U.P. State Sugar Corporation and anr. Vs. Sukhveer Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2008(118)FLR596]; (2008)IIILLJ779All

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.K. Sinha

Rajiv Sharma, J.1. Heard Mr. P.K. Sinha, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Virendra Singh Chandel, learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 1.Undisputed facts of the case are that the opposite party No. 1,...