Advanced Search Results

Wipro Limited and Another Vs. Cavinkare Private Limited and Others

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Intellectual Property

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Gladys Daniel

ORDER (No. 204/2012) S. Usha, Vice-Chairman: 1. Applications for removal of the trade marks “Fairever” under Nos.1014841 in Class 3, 810756 in Class 3, 1249412 in Class 3 and 1255978 in Class 3 under the provisions...

Nikunj Sanghani @ Nicunj Sanghani and Ors. vs State, Govt. of Nct of D ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shashi Shanker, Mr. Shoaib Haider, Mr. Vineet Agarwal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 4th December, 2025 Pronounced on: 24th February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 1896/2021, CRL.M.A. 12957/2021 & 34182/20251. NIKUNJ SANGHANI @ NICUNJ SANGHANI S/o Sh. Rajesh V....

Bhupinder Singh and ors Vs. State and anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 (IPC) - Sections 498A, 406, 34

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Vineet Agarwal, Adv.

1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that vide FIR No. 156/2010, a case under Sections 498A/406/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 was registered against the petitioners at P.S. Vikas Puri. Further submits, that the matter has been...

National Panasonic India Ltd. Vs. Seevoice Magnetics India (P) Ltd. an ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Companies Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 10

Reported in : III(2007)BC328

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Suman, Adv

A.K. Sikri, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the instant suit for recovery of Rs. 25,00,000/-. The averments made as per the plaint are that the plaintiff is a Group Company of renowned Matsushita Group, Japan, who...

Kishore Baliram Balu Vs. Dy Comr of Police, Zone-i and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

G.S. Patel, J. 1. Since June 2013, we have had to deal with a quite extraordinary number of petitions challenging appellate orders under Section 60 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 in externment proceedings. Those appellate...

Mrs. Meenakshi Naresh Thakur Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

G.S. Patel, J. 1. Rule. Mrs. Kantharia, learned APP waives service on behalf of the Respondents. By consent, Rule made returnable forthwith and Petition called out for hearing and final disposal. 2. This is a Writ...

Masiullha Abdul Mohid Idrisi Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Police and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

P.C. By this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner is challenging the order of externment which has been passed by the Externing Authority and confirmed by the Appellate Authority. 2....