Advanced Search Results

Hira Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : The Demobilised Armed Forces Personnel (Reservation of Vacancy in H.P. State Non-Technical Services) Rules 1972

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.D. Khidta, Adv.

1. Petitioner joined the Indian Army in 1980. He was discharged from the Indian Army. Thereafter, he applied for the post of Physical Education Teacher. He was appointed as Physical Education Teacher on 18.09.1998 against the...

Devi Dutt Sharma and ors. Vs. H.P. University and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 12

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Adv.

1. Petitioners are working in the Agro-Economic Research Centre, Himachal Pradesh University. The Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation has set up Agro-Economic Research Centre under the Himachal Pradesh University vide...

Netar Singh Vs. Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pr ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. T.C. Sharma, Adv.

1. Petitioner was appointed as Craft Teacher on 2 nd February, 1968 and after acquiring higher academic as well as professional qualification, he was promoted as Trained Graduate Teacher with effect from 21 st June, 1976....

Lahori Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : The Demobilised Armed Forces Personnel (Reservation of Vacancy in H.P. State Non-Technical Services) Rules 1972

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.D. Khidta, Adv.

1. Petitioner joined the Indian Army in 1974. He was discharged in 1997.Thereafter, he joined as a Physical Education Teacher in the respondent-department on 30.07.1998 against the General category. Since the petitioner was an Exserviceman, he...

Chander Mohan Negi and Others Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh Through Se ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Education

1. Petitioners have undertaken Junior Basic Teacher training from Government DIETs in the academic Session 2008- 2010. Case of the petitioners, in a nutshell, is that the respondent-State has appointed Primary Assistant Teachers against the post(s)...

Col S.K. JaIn Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The OA No.445/2010 was filed in the Armed Forces Tribunal on 27.07.2010. 2. Vide this OA the applicant has sought quashing and setting aside of the findings and sentence of the General Court Martial (GCM)...

Jai Dev Chauhan Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : The Demobilized Armed Forces Personnel Rule 1972 - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Raghu Nandan Chaudhary; Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advs.

1. Petitioner joined the Indian Army on 9 th June, 1966. He was discharged on 30 th June, 1990. He was appointed against the post reserved for Ex-serviceman as J.B.T. Teacher and he joined as such...

NaIn Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules 1972 - Rule 68

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.S. Gautam, Adv.

1. Petitioner retired after attaining the age of superannuation as Deputy Ranger on 30 th November, 2003. However, a sum of ` 45,905/- was withheld from the Death-cumRetirement Gratuity of the petitioner. 2. Mr. R.S. Gautam,...

Smt. meera devi and ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C) - Order 22 Rules 3, 9(2)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. J.R. Poswal, Adv.

1. Notice. Mr. Vikas Rathore, learned Deputy Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard. In view of the grounds taken in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the delay in filing the application under Order 22 Rule 3 & Rule 9(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Notice. Mr. Vikas Rathore, learned Deputy Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard. Not contested. The legal representatives of the deceased petitioner mentioned in para 2 of the application are permitted to be brought on record as petitioners. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary...

Anupam Thakur and Others Vs. State of H.P. and Others

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Education

Rajiv Sharma, J. CMP No.5518/2011 1. Heard. The application is not opposed. Allowed. Priyanka Thakur is permitted to be added as petitioner No.4. Registry is directed to carry out necessary correction in the memo of parties....