Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr venkataramani · Page 1 of about 81 results (0.057 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 02 2010

T.Manivannan, and ors. Vs. the Director General of Police, and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-02-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Venkataramani, Adv.

1. The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking an order in the nature of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent passed in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1972

Pals theatres and ors. Vs. B. Abdul Gaffoor Saheb and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-08-1972

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1972)2MLJ554

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Venkataramani, Mr. Parasaran

K.S. Palaniswamy, J.1. The only point that arises for determination in this appeal filed by the defendants (the first defendant being a firm of which the partners are defendants 2 and 3) is whether the suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1972

V.T. Veerappa Chettiar Vs. P.S. Palaniappa Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-26-1972

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 63

Reported in : AIR1973Mad313; (1973)1MLJ316

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Venkataramani

ORDER1. This petition is filed by one Veerappa Chettiar, respondent in E. A. 479 of 1971, against the order of the Subordinate Judge. Devakottai directing ratable distribution of the assets in court between him and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 27 2012

New Horizon Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Govt. of Pondicherry.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-27-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, (SARFAESI). - Sections 13(2), 17; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 25FF; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provision) Act, 1958; Banking Regulations Act, 1949 - Section 5(c); Reserve Bank of India Act, 1949 (RBI) - Sections 45(1), 45S, 58B(5A), 58G; Tamil Nadu Act - Section 2(3); Companies Act, 1956 - Section 58(A), 58AA; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 18, 21, 31; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 11

Reported in : AIR2013SC584; 2012(10)SCC575; AIR2012SCW5164

ALTAMAS KABIR, J.1. Several Special Leave Petitions (now Civil Appeals) were filed in this Court against the common judgment and order dated 27th March, 2007, passed by the Madras High Court, including Writ Appeal Nos.1788 &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2012

Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad Vs K. Narayana Rao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-21-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1898 - Sections 482, 227, 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 109; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(2)(, 13(1)(d)

P. Sathasivam, J.1) Leave granted.2) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 09.07.2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Petition No. 2347 of 2008 whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2025

T.Veemaraj Vs The Director General of police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-29-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 06.11.2024PRONOUNCED ON : 29.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH and W.M.P.Nos.3256 & 6783 of 2021 In W.P.No.2902 of 2021 T.Veemaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director General...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2024

Sita Soren Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-04-2024

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : __ GAURAV AGRAWAL

Reportable 2024 INSC161IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.451 of 2019 Sita Soren …Appellant Versus Union of India …Respondent Page 1 of 135 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2025

Sri Anilkumar B S vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-10-2025

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 11683 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI ANILKUMAR B S, AGED ABOUT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 2025

S.Siva vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-04-2025

2025:MHC:2523IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 08.08.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 04.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C . K U M A R A P P A N WP.Nos.8916, 10456, 21164 and 21848 of 2025 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2004

Bibekananda Das Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Nov-19-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 31(2), 32, 162, 226 and 309; Assam Police Service Rules, 1966 - Rules 2, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1), 5(1)(6), 6, 7, 7(1), 7(4) to 7(7), 8, 8(1), 8(1)(6), 8(2), 10, 13, 14, 18, 18(1), 19, 22, 23, 29 and 56; Assam Police Service (Recruitment) Rules - Rule 5(1); Assam Executive Business Rules, 1968 - Rules 10(1), 10(2) and 17; Assam Administrative Tribunal Act, 1977 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5 and 5(1); Assam Police Service Regulations - Regulation 3, 3(1) and 3(4A); Limitation Act; Kerala General Sales Tax Act - Sections 8 and 10; Residuary Rules - Rule 3; Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission (Limitation of Functions) Regulations, 1957 - Regulation 4; Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 - Rules 5, 23 and 37;

Advocate for Appellant : N. Dutta, B.R. Bhattacharjee, H.N. Sharma, G.N. Sahewalla, B.P. Kataki, K.P. Pathak and K.N. Choudhury, Advs.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. Our constitutional scheme for governance is based on the rule of law. Absence of arbitrary power, as the Apex Court observed in S.G. Jaisinghani v. Union of India and Ors. : [1967]65ITR34(SC) ,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial