Advanced Search Results

K.Ramachandran Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil Service

Acts : Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules - Rule 17(b)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.R.Muthukumar, Adv.

The petitioner was working as an Assistant Executive Engineer in the Public Works Department during the year 1995-96 and his name was not included in the panel of the Assistant Executive Engineer for the year 1995-96...

Nainar Moopanar Vs. Kumaraswamy Alias Murugan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1998)3MLJ512

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. The appellant is the defendant in the suit filed by the respondent in O.S. No. 71 of 1983 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli, seeking the relief of redemption...

Murugaiyan Vs. Meenakshi Ammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1989)1MLJ376

ORDERK.M. Natarajan, J.1. This application is filed under Section 151, Civil Procedure Code, for stay of ; final decree proceedings in O.S. No. 1069 of 1980 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Villupuram, pending...

S.V. Saminatha Naidu Vs. L. Muthuswamy Chettiar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1989)1MLJ257

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Velusamy

Srinivasan, J.1. The appellant filed the suit for recovery of Rs. 4037.32 P. under peculiar circumstances. He was the owner of the suit property. He executed a usufrucutary mortgage in favour of Alli Rani on 23.2.75...

Chellappa Sebastian and anr. Vs. R.C. Diocese Through Its Procurator G ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1976)1MLJ435

P.R. Gokulakrishnan, J.1. These two civil revision petitions arise out of the order of eviction passed by the Courts below. The respondents who are the landlords filed eviction proceedings against two tenants numbered as R.C.O.P. No....

Boomayil Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1999CriLJ2738

Advocate for Appellant : C. Duraipandian, Adv.

ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J. 1. Boomayil, the wife of one Muthuramalingam, the accused in a murder case in which one Leelavathy, Municipal Councilor of Madurai was done to death, has filed this petition, probably to ventilate the...

Shanthilal M. Thakker and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1991)2MLJ284

ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The petitioners originally challenged the award proceedings which was dated 22.9.1986 under the Land Acquisition Act. By a subsequent amendment to the prayer in the Writ petition, the petitioners attack the Notification under Section...

A. Raja Vs. Ingnasi

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 -- Sections 10(2)(3); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 53-A

Reported in : 1999(1)CTC339; (1999)IIMLJ21

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Velusami, Adv.

ORDER1. The unsuccessful tenant has preferred the revision aggrieved against the order of eviction passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority Madurai in R.C.A.No.127 of 1992.2. The respondent/landlord filed a petition for eviction against the tenant...

K. Andi Reddiar Vs. Ovu Ammal and 5 Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 101, 102 and 103; Specific Relief Act, 1963 -- Sections 34 and 37; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 151 -- Order 39, Rule 1; Succession Act, 1925 -- Sections 59, 61 and 63

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC184

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M. Velusamy, Adv.

ORDER1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.344 of 1983 on the file of District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti, who had succeeded before the trial court and lost before the first appellate court is the appellant in this second appeal,...

Chairman, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009CriLJ854

Advocate for Appellant : C.K. Chandrasekaran, Adv. for Row and Reddy

K. Kannan, J.1. Heard Mr. C.K. Chandrasekaran, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S. Ramasamy, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for respondents.Nature of action:2. This case depicts yet another sordid episode of an...