Advanced Search Results

Naimat Kaur Anand and ors. Vs. M/S. Decon Company

Court : Delhi

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)250; 82(1999)DLT389; 1999(51)DRJ428

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rakesh Aggarwal, Adv

ORDERVikramjit Sen, J.1. Both these applications have been filed for setting aside ex-parte decree dated 15.9.1995, can be disposed of together. In the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 it is set...

Pattu W/O.Nagappan. Vs. the Velur Selection Grade Town Panchayat, and ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Ms.B.Vaigai, for Mr.Vasudevan, Adv.

1.The petitioners have come up with the present writ petitions for a mandamus directing the respondents 1 & 2 to forbear from evicting them from their Shops situated in the Bus Stand in Paramathi Velur, Velur...

V. Ratna Mudaliar (Died) and ors. Vs. the Cantonment Board of St. Thom ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : (1958)1MLJ349

ORDERBalakrishna Ayyar, J.1. The petitioner together with his brothers purchased the property-known as the Pallavaram Private Market under a sale-deed, dated 9th October, 1930. This property is situate within the limits of the Cantonment of St....

Madras Race Club Vs. Dr. K.R. Lakshmanan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 167 and 560; Madras Race Club (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1986

Reported in : [1997]88CompCas754(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Parasaran, Adv.

Jagadeesan, J.1. The Madras Race Club has filed the present appeal against the order of the Company Law Board, Southern Region Bench, Madras, in C.P. No. 660/167/SRB/96, dated August 17, 1996. The respondent herein, a member...

Verco Private Ltd., Padi and ors. Vs. Newandram Naraindas and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 87; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 37, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1974Mad4

1. Defendants 1 and 3 to 5 in O. S. No. 106 of 1967, on the file of VIII Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, who succeeded before the trial Judge, but lost before the appellate...

Verco Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Newandram Naraindas and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1973)2MLJ92

M.M. Ismail, J.1. Defendants 1 and 3 to 5 in O.S. No. 106 of 1967, on the file of the VIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, who succeeded before the trial Judge, but lost before...

Union of India and ors. Vs. R.P.Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6717 OF2008UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .......APPELLANTS VERSUS R.P.SINGH ......RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Calling in question the legal defensibility of the judgment and order...

The Federal Bank Ltd Represented by Its Authorized Officer vs Sub Regi ...

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 25TH JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 10323 OF 2023 PETITIONER: THE FEDERAL BANK LTD LCRD...

Devagiri Pandu Ranga Vs. the Government of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 6(1), 9(3), 12 and 16

Reported in : ILR2000KAR774; 2000(2)KarLJ96

Advocate for Appellant : Sri S. Vasudeva, Adv.

ORDER1. The writ petition is taken up with the consent of parties.2. The petitioner in this writ petition challenges the acquisition proceedings with respect to Sy. No. 15/1 measuring 2 acres 21 guntas. The petitioner also...

Bank of Baroda Vs. Thapar Traders and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rules 4, 9 and 10A.

Reported in : [1993]76CompCas680(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Prakash Vasudevan, Adv

Usha Mehra, J.1. The application of the plaintiff in which he sought that the abatement, if any, against defendant No. 3 be set aside, inter alia, on the grounds that defendant No. 3, Shri Joginder Lal,...