Advanced Search Results
Pandhari and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Aurangabad
Jun-11-2015
Criminal
Mr. V.D.Gunale, Mr. K.B.Autade
1. By the present Appeal, appellants are questioning the correctness of the Judgment and Order of conviction passed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Latur dated 26/04/2000 in Sessions Case No. 56/1998. By the said, appellant No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Sattar Mahetab Khoriwale Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-08-2011
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 482, 320; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 354, 34,; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 5
ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. At the request of the learned Counsel for the applicants, leave to amend granted. Amendment be carried out forthwith. 3. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Aabarao Raje Age : 32 Years, Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Jul-19-2010
Land Acquisition
Constitution of India - Article 226, ; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Section 56-B, 60
Mr.A.M. Gaddime,; Mr.V.D. Gunale, Advs.
1. Leave to amend prayer clause `B' granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.3. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of learned counsel for respective parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing, at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›