Advanced Search Results
Pechiammal Vs. Veerappa thevar and ors.
Chennai
Aug-02-1971
FamilyProperty
Hindu Law of Inheritance Amendment Act, 1929 - Sections 1(2) and 2; Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(1); Hindu Gains of Learning Act, 1930; Hindu Law; Mayne's Hindu Law
AIR1972Mad296
Mr. V. C. Veeraraghavan
1. Does the coparcennary property in the hands of the last male-holder fall within the scope of the Hindu Law of Inheritance Amendment Act (Central Act II of 1929) is the question that arises for determination...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaruppa Kudumban Vs. Arokiam Servai
Chennai
Jul-14-1978
Civil
(1979)1MLJ370
Mr. V.C. Veeraraghavan
V. Balasubrahmanyan, J.1. This second appeal arises out of a suit for specific performance of an agreement to reconvey an item of immoveable property. The suit was filed by an assignee from the original vendor. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.S. Devaraja Gramani Vs. Murugesan
Chennai
Feb-25-1966
Tenancy
Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921 - Sections 9; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act - Sections 41; Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947
AIR1967Mad295
Mr. V. C. Veeraraghavan
(1) This revision is directed against the order of the appellate court allowing an application under Section 9 of the Madras City Tenants Protection Act 1921, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The landlord who is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
J.K.M. Yacob Rowther Sons, Mettypalayam Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Mar-06-1964
Civil
Indian Railways Act - Sections 72; Indian Contract Act - Sections 151, 152 and 161; Indian Sale of Goods Act - Sections 39
AIR1965Mad162
Mr. V. C. Veeraraghavan
S. Ramachandra Iyer, C.J.(1) On 13-10-1959 the petitioner, a merchant at Mettupalayam doing business in green vegetables, sent by the railway sixteen bags of cabbage for delivery at Howard to one K. K. Banerjee and Bros....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.S. Devaraja Gramani Vs. Murugesan
Chennai
Feb-25-1966
Tenancy
(1966)2MLJ340
Mr. V.C. Veeraraghavan
M. Natesan, J.1. This revision is directed against the order of the appellate Court allowing an application under Section 9 of the Madras City Tenants' Protection Act, 1922, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The landlord...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamaswami Goundar Vs. Muthuvel Goundar and anr.
Chennai
Apr-04-1958
Civil
(1959)2MLJ212
ORDERPanchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. This is an appeal by one Ramaswami Goundar, a judgment-debtor in O.S. No. 244 of 1949 on the file of the District Munsif, Dindigul, against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChidambaram Chettiar Vs. Periyasamy Chettiar
Chennai
Apr-10-1978
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 136; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 66
AIR1978Mad370
V.C. Viraraghavan, Adv.
Nainar Sundaram, J.1. This revision arises out of execution proceedings. The petitioner herein is the decree-holder. The respondent herein is the judgment-debtor. Thedecree in question is dated 29-4-1961. Earlier, E. P. 1050 of 1972 was filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLakshmi Ammal Vs. the Special Tahsildar (LA.) Miscellaneous Scheme and ...
Chennai
Dec-19-1978
Property
(1979)2MLJ26
Mr. V.G. Veeraraghavan
S. Mohan, J.1. This appeal arises out of a reference made under sections, 30 and 31 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act.2. An extent of 3 acres 68 cents in S. No. 18/5 of Eraravur village...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaduari K. Rengiah Chettiar and Co., Madurai Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Jan-24-1969
Civil
Indian Railways Act - Sections 74; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 30
AIR1971Mad34
ORDER1. The plaintiff is the revision petitioner. His case was that a consignment of 145 bags of gramdhal was booked from Jakhodhere to Tuticorin under invoice No. 2 dated 10-7-1962, a copy of which was marched...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubbathal Vs. Kittammal
Chennai
Sep-10-1968
Civil
(1971)1MLJ293
K.S. Ramamurti, J.1. Defendants 2 to 4 who failed in the Courts below are the appellants in this second appeal. The main point that arises for decision is whether the consent decree in an earlier litigation,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »