Advanced Search Results
Omkar Engineering Works Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise
Gujarat
Dec-03-1976
Excise
1992(37)ECC31
Mr. V.B. Patel
S. Obul Reddi, C.J.1. The short question that arises in this Special Civil Application is whether the items listed, namely, tool-box, folding-pole, jack, angles supporter, chains, brake-pipe, pipe-stand, draw-bar and tomy are components of a trailer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Customs Vs. Modern Apparels
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-04-1995
Land Acquisition
(1996)(85)ELT305TriDel
Mr. V.B. Patel
1. Being aggrieved with the order-in-appeal dated 27-4-1994, passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay, the present appeal has been filed by the Revenue.2. The matter relates to the applicability of the exemption Notification No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEchjay Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. M. Shivubha and ors.
Gujarat
Nov-08-1993
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 11, 11A, 33, 33(2), 33(2) and 37
(1994)2GLR1234; (1994)IILLJ1234Guj
Mr. V. B. Patel
1. The only question which arises in these three petitions under Arts. 226 and 227 of the constitution of India filed by the Industrial Company is whether the Labour court had committed an error of law...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Central Pulp Mills Ltd., Surat Vs. Central Pulp Mills Employees Union ...
Gujarat
Aug-25-1993
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25M and 25M(4)
(1993)2GLR1688; (1994)ILLJ1096Guj
Mr. V. B. Patel
Shethna, J.1. The Central Pulp Mills Ltd., the petitioner, has filed this petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned award passed on 7-71993 by the Industrial Tribunal, Surat in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Gujarat Vs. Gordhandas Keshavji Gandhi and ors.
Gujarat
Oct-31-1961
Civil
Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 87
AIR1962Guj128; (1962)0GLR269
J.M. Thakore, Adv. General,; H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader and;
Desai, C.J. 1. This Special Full Bench has been constituted in order to consider the question relating to the binding nature of the judicial precedents of the Bombay High Court prior to 1st May, 1960, on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirector of Stores Vs. P.S. Dube
Gujarat
Jul-28-1977
Labour and Industrial
(1978)19GLR253
S. Obul Reddi, C.J.1. The short and interesting question that arises for consideration in this petition is whether a 'worker' as defined under the Factories Act, 1948, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is entitled to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.J. Patel and ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.
Gujarat
Apr-18-1963
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 3, 4, 162, 309, 310 and 326; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 115 to 117; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 81(6); Bombay Allocated Government Servants (Absorption, Seniority, Pay and Allowances) Rules, 1957 - Rules 3 and 4
AIR1965Guj234a
V.B. Patel, Adv. Assisted by J.C. Patel, Adv.
Desai, C.J. (1) This special civil application raises important questions of law relating to the construction of some of the provisions of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956. There has been a divergence of opinion between the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurat Mahila Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. Vs. Mamtaben Mahendrabhai Joshi
Gujarat
Apr-21-2001
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25F; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2001(90)FLR666]; (2002)1GLR755; (2001)IILLJ567Guj
V.B. Patel, Senior Adv. and; Deepak V. Patel, Adv.
P.B. Majmudar, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 9th May, 2000 passed in Special Civil Application No. 8195 of 1999 (Coram : H. K. Rathod, J....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhedut Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandali Ltd. and ors. Vs. Its Workmen and ...
Gujarat
Jan-30-1979
Labour and Industrial
(1979)1GLR858
B.J. Divan, C.J.1. Since the questions arising for decision in all these matters pertain to the main substantial award which is one and the same for all these matters, we will dispose of all these six...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandulal H. Ghodasara and Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Gujarat
Apr-03-1997
Property
Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1897 - Sections 214; Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972 - Rules 18(2), 18(4), 108 and 108(6); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 - Sections 65, 65(3) and 67; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1998Guj84; (1997)2GLR1451
V.B. Patel, Sr. Adv.,; Deepak V. Patel and; D.G. Chauhan
ORDERR.R. Jain, J. 1. All these petitions are disposed of by common this judgment since identical questions of law and facts are involved. Except change in Survey Number and names of parties, all the relevant facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »