Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr thakkar · Page 1 of about 305 results (0.095 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 02 1992

Maheshbhai H. Parekh Vs. District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-02-1992

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

Reported in : 1994CriLJ365

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Thakkar, Adv.

K.J. Vaidya, J.1. The petitioner who happens to be a cousin brother of the detenu-Rajnikant Shantilal Parekh, has by this writ of Habeas Corpus, challenged the impugned order of detention dated 26-8-1992 made by the District...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2004

Jitendra Narayanbhai Rajgor Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-12-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 114, 115, 118, 120B, 167, 182, 186, 193, 195, 196, 199, 209, 200, 204, 211, 219, 220, 294, 341, 348, 364A, 384, 395, 397, 409, 410, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 474, 477A, 489 and 506(2); Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 3, 72, 156, 157, 173, 173(2), 190(1), 195, 195(1), 340, 341 and 438; Bombay Money Lenders Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 7 and 33

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2371; (2004)3GLR2226

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Thakkar and; K.J. Panchal, Advs. in Criminal Misc. Application No. 4934 of 2004 and;

K.A. Puj, J.1. RULE. Mr. A.D. Oza, learned Public Prosecutor waives service of rule on behalf of respondent - State.2. Since both these applications are arising out of the same offence, the same were heard together...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 1981

Trustees and Executors of the Late Shri Shamji Kheta Vs. Income-tax Of ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-1981

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34(1)

Reported in : [1984]148ITR219(Bom)

Tulpule, J.1. This petition by the trustees appointed under the will of deceased Shamji Kheta under arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenges the issuance of a notice to the trustees under s. 23(2) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 30 1974

Cricket Club of India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Madhav L. Apte and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-30-1974

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(3), 2(4), 6, 9, 29, 31, 36, 165, 169, 169(6), 252, 252(4), 255(1), 255(2), 273, 274, 274(1), 274(3), 283, 283(1), 283(3) and 293

Reported in : [1975]45CompCas574(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.J. Sorabjee, Adv.

S.K. Desai, J.1. This is a special case filed for the opinion of this court under the provisions of order 36 of the Civil Procedure Code. Three questions have been asked at the end of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 1998

Bedrock Ltd. (In the Matter of Scheme of Compromise/Arrangement Betwee ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-17-1998

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 394 and 433; Companies Act, 1948 - Sections 206

Reported in : 1998(3)ALLMR729; 1998(4)BomCR710; (1998)2BOMLR5; [2000]101CompCas343(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Chagla, ;F.E. Devitre, Advs., i/b ;Federal & ;Rashmikant;N.G. Thakkar, ;S.S. Shetye, Advs., i/b ;Mahimkar & Co., ;H.K. Vardhan, Adv., ;P.C. for R.D. Dept. of Co.

ORDERS.S. Nijjar, J.1. The petitioner under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed for the sanction of a scheme of compromise/arrangement, hereinafter referred to as 'the 1996 agreement.' This compromise agreement...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2024

Sri Vikram Ballari Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-31-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

R Reserved on :13. 08.2024 Pronounced on :31. 08.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7467 OF2024C/W WRIT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2024

Sri Basavaraj Shivappa Mutthagi Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-31-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

R Reserved on :13. 08.2024 Pronounced on :31. 08.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7467 OF2024C/W WRIT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2005

State of Gujarat Vs. Natwar Harchandji Thakor

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-22-2005

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 40, 41, 46, 46A, 65, 66, 66(1), 85, 85(1), 85(1)(1), 85(1)(3) and 85(3); Bombay Police Act - Sections 110, 117 and 135; Prevention of Corruption Act; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 16(1); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 27; Employees' Provident Fund Act; Madras Prohibition Act - Sections 4(1); Evidence Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235(2), 240(2), 241, 248(2), 251, 252, 255(2), 262, 265A to 265K, 325, 354(3), 354(4), 360, 361, 465 and 537; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 243; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1969; Constitution of India - Article 134(1)

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2957; (2005)1GLR709

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Thakkar, as Senior Adv. Amicus Curiae; L.R. Pujari, A.P.P.

J.N. Bhatt, J.Prelude (Focal Point)Let us at the very outset, evidently record, remember, and recollect that ;'A civilisation is judged by the way it treats its criminals.'1. In this group of criminal appeals, specially assigned to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2001

Chandanben Chunilal Patel Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-23-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : (2002)4GLR3502

Advocate for Appellant : Thakkar Assoc. for Petitioner Nos. 1-4

H.K. Rathod, J.1. Heard learned Sr. Advocate Mr. P.M. Thakkar for the petitioners and Mr. Sen, the learned AGP for the respondent authorities. Initially, notice was issued in this matter and it was made returnable on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1997

Akai Impex Ltd. Vs. General Steel Export and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-19-1997

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 38, Rules 1 and 2; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126

Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR170; 1998(2)BomCR199

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Rajani Iyer and V.K. Ramabhadran, Advs.

ORDERS.S. Nijjar, J. 1. This suit has been filed by the plaintiffs for a declaration that the first defendants are not entitled to claim, demand or receive an amount to the extent of U.S. $ 2,16,819.55...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial