Advanced Search Results

Emperor Vs. Murray Gow Purdy

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1947Bom184; (1946)48BOMLR752

Macklin, J.1. This matter comes before us by way of appeal from a person who was tried before Mr. Justice Coyajee and, on. the Judge directing that a new trial be held, committed contempt of Court...

Emperor Vs. Tapidas Durlabhdas

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR732

Chandavarkar, J.1. The appellant has been convicted by the Chief Presidency Magistrate under Section 486 of the Indian Penal Code. The first question raised by the appellant's counsel is whether the appellant's trade mark is a...

B.B. Billimoria and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2 and 4

Reported in : 1983(2)BomCR618

Advocate for Appellant : F.H.J. Talyarkhan, Adv. i/b. ;Gagrat and Co.,

R.A. Jahagirdar, J.1. This petition arises out of the proceedings started under the provision of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, hereinafter referred to as 'the Ceiling Act'. The two petitioners together own a...

Bombay Environment Action Group and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Contitution of India - Article 226; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1991Bom301; 1991(2)BomCR541; (1991)92BOMLR616

Advocate for Appellant : Atul Setalwad and ;F.H.J. Talyarkhan and ;Sham Divan, ;Gautam Patel and ;Rajan Jaykar, Advs. i/b. ;M/s. Jaykar & Co.

1. These two writ petitions seek to challenge the permissions granted by both the State and the Central Governments to the Bombay Suburban Electric Supply Company Limited (hereafter 'the Company') for establishing a 500 mega watt...

The Advocate General Vs. Rustamji B. Sunawalla

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1912)14BOMLR691

Russell, J.1. In this matter the Advocate General of Bombay presented a petition against R. B. Soonawalla, an advocate this Court, charging him with gross misconduct as an advocate.2. The effect of the petition is that...

Bombay Tyres International Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4)

Reported in : 1989(21)LC43(Bombay); 1989(39)ELT544(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

1. This writ petition under Article 226 impugns the order of the 3rd respondent dated 1st November 1974 rejecting the petitioners' application for refund of a part of the excise duty paid upon their product 'tread...

Indian Lead Private Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act; Customs Act; Custom Tariff Act - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1988(16)ECC162; 1987(31)ELT688(Bom)

ORDER1. The petitioners imported, between December 1981 and February 1982, certain items of drained battery scrap and battery plate scrap all being lead scrap. The petitioners had to pay an additional duty under Section 3(1) of...

Satellite Engineering Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 14

Reported in : 1988(19)LC33(Bombay); 1987(31)ELT356(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

Bharucha, J.1. The appeal assails the judgment and order of Pendse, J. dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants.2. The appellants manufacture fluorescent starter switches. Prior to 1961 a company called Permanand Maneklal & Company...

Ruby Mills Limited and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 198, 198(1), 309, 309(1), 310 and 314

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas193(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

Pratap, J.1. This petition under art, 226 of the Constitution raises a short but interestingquestion relating to interpretation of ss. 309 and 310 of the Companies Act, 1956, viz :'Do the professional fees and charges payable...

Bipinchandra Vrajlal Ghelani Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1988(15)ECC77; 1987(31)ELT694(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

ORDER1. The Joint Chief Controller of Imports and Exports granted import licence under import policy AM 81-82 on May 11, 1981. The C.I.F. value of licence was Rs. 20,310/- and the shipment was to be done...