Advanced Search Results

Satellite Engineering Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 14

Reported in : 1988(19)LC33(Bombay); 1987(31)ELT356(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

Bharucha, J.1. The appeal assails the judgment and order of Pendse, J. dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants.2. The appellants manufacture fluorescent starter switches. Prior to 1961 a company called Permanand Maneklal & Company...

Bipinchandra Vrajlal Ghelani Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and Ajay M. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1988(14)LC520(Bombay)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

H. Suresh, J.1. The Joint Chief Controller of Imports and Exports granted import licence under import policy AM 1981-82 on May 11 1981 The C.I.F. value or licence was Rs. 20,310/- and the shipment was to...

Bipinchandra Vrajlal Ghelani Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1988(15)ECC77; 1987(31)ELT694(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

ORDER1. The Joint Chief Controller of Imports and Exports granted import licence under import policy AM 81-82 on May 11, 1981. The C.I.F. value of licence was Rs. 20,310/- and the shipment was to be done...

Bombay Tyres International Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4)

Reported in : 1989(21)LC43(Bombay); 1989(39)ELT544(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

1. This writ petition under Article 226 impugns the order of the 3rd respondent dated 1st November 1974 rejecting the petitioners' application for refund of a part of the excise duty paid upon their product 'tread...

Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111 and 129(3)

Reported in : 1987(31)ELT51(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

1. The petitioners imported what are known as industrial fatty acids. This was between December 11, 1980 and February 9, 1981. As the goods landed, the Customs department sought to confiscate them on the ground that...

The Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1988(14)LC588(Bombay)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

ORDERH. Suresh, J.1. The petitioners imported what are known as industrial fatty acids. This was between December 11, 1980 and February 9, 1981. As the goods landed, the Customs department sought to confiscate them on the...

Mcdowell and Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111 and 112; Central Excise Act

Reported in : 1988(19)LC49(Bombay); 1988(38)ELT454(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

1. The short question that is involved in this petition is as to whether whisky, imported by the petitioners is a 'concentrate whisky' or otherwise.2. The petitioners say that amongst the various brands of whiskies manufactured...

Choksi Purshottam Vishrambhai Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act

Reported in : 1989(23)LC306(Bombay); 1984(17)ELT46(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

1. The petition raises the question as to whether certain gold bangles are ornaments within the meaning of the Gold Control Act, 1968.2. The petitioners are a partnership firm and they deal in the sale and...

Ruby Mills Limited and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 198, 198(1), 309, 309(1), 310 and 314

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas193(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Talyarkhan

Pratap, J.1. This petition under art, 226 of the Constitution raises a short but interestingquestion relating to interpretation of ss. 309 and 310 of the Companies Act, 1956, viz :'Do the professional fees and charges payable...

Emperor Vs. Murray Gow Purdy

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1947Bom184; (1946)48BOMLR752

Macklin, J.1. This matter comes before us by way of appeal from a person who was tried before Mr. Justice Coyajee and, on. the Judge directing that a new trial be held, committed contempt of Court...