Advanced Search Results
Sundaram Nadar Vs. Sukumaran
Chennai
Aug-04-2000
Commercial
Benami Transaction Prohibition Act, 1988 -- Sections 3 and 4(2); Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 101 to 103; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 100; Indian Trust Act, 1882; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34
2000(3)CTC473
Mr. T.R. Mani, Senior Counsel for ;Mr. T.M. Hariharan, Adv.
ORDER1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.11 of 1981 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Kuzhithurai, is the appellant in the second appeal. 2. The parties are father and son. The suit was filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.R.i. Limited, No. 33, College Road, Chennai Vs. Murali Mani and Thre ...
Chennai
Nov-17-2000
Tenancy
Tamil Nadu Building Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(3), 11(4) and 27
(2001)1MLJ118
Mr. T.R. Mani, Senior Counsel
ORDER1. This civil revision petition has been filed by the tenant, as revision petitioner, against the judgment and decree, dated 1.8.2000 and made in R.C.A.No.395 of 1997, on the file of the VII Judge, Court of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Ramarao Vs. the Divisional Engineer (Telegraphs) Telegraphs Office ...
Chennai
Apr-16-1999
Miscellaneous
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 80; Indian Telelgraph Rules, 1951 -- Rules 24 and 445
1999(2)CTC290
Mr. T.R. Mani, Senior Counsel for ;T.M. Hariharan
ORDER1. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 525 of 1985 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Paramakudi, who had lost the suit claim before the two Courts below is the appellant. The suit out of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Srinivasa Iyer Vs. Dakshinamurthi
Chennai
Feb-01-2000
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 105; Easements Act, 1882 -- Sections 52; Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955 -- Sections 2
AIR2000Mad388; 2000(1)CTC616
Mr. T.R. Mani, Senior Counsel for ;Mr. T.M. Hariharan
ORDER1.The plaintiff who had succeeded before the trial court and lost before the first appellate court is the appellant in this second appeal.2. The issue that arises for consideration is whether the second defendant is a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Rookshana Nazir Vs. U.M.D.Shaukathulla and 5 Others
Chennai
Dec-15-1998
Tenancy
Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 -- Sections 5, 14(1) and 25
1998(3)CTC687
Mr. J.R.K. Bhavanandam, Adv.,;M/S. Himmatmal Mardia, Adv.,;Mr.Lakshmi Narain, Adv.,;Mr.T.R. Mani, Senior Counsel, for;M/s. Shah & Shah,;M/s. Shah & Shah, Adv.,;Mr.T. Viswanatha Rao,;Mr. D. Ash
ORDER1. In all these revisions, the respondents are the owners of the petition mentioned building and the petitioners are the tenants. The respondents/landlords filed the respective petitions for eviction against all these petitioners/tenants under Section 14(1)(b)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPappa Vs. Shanmughathammal and Others
Chennai
Jun-14-1990
Trusts and Societies
Hindu Law; Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 6, 10, 19 and 23; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 87 and 118; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 10
AIR1991Mad90; (1991)IIMLJ555
K. Sengottaian, Adv.
ORDERK.M. Natarajan, J.1. This appeal is filed by the unsuccessful plaintiff against the judgment and decree passed by the II Additional Subordinate Judge Madurai, in O. S. No. 486 of 1977 dismissing the suit filed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Thirumalai Nambi Vs. Maharaja Pillai
Chennai
Sep-03-1975
CivilProperty
(1976)2MLJ55
Mr. T.R. Mani
S. Mohan, J.1. The plaintiff is the appellant before me. The short facts in the second appeal are as follows:2. The plaintiff preferred O.S. No. 343 of 1970 on the file of the District Munsif's Court,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. (Mrs.) Ruth Annamalai Vs. Mrs. Valliammai Achi, W/O of Late Dr. Al ...
Chennai
Mar-21-1991
Family
T.N. Court-fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Schedule - Sections 55, 56, 61 and 63 - Articles 1 to 6, 7, 11(K); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 261, 264, 265, 266, 268, 276, 284, 295 and 299; High Court Original Side Rules - Order 25, Rules 4, 25, 55, 689, 690 and 692; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 235; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). 1908 - Sections 26, 75 to 78, 86, 87-B, 90 to 92, 94, 95, 100, 104, 141 and 144 - Order 41 Rule 1; Original Side Rules, 1956 - Order 2, Rules 2, 20 to 50, 51 to 68; Government of India Act, 1915; Indian Oaths Act, 1873; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Parition Act, 1893; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890; Indian Divorce Act,1869; Specific Relief Act, 1877; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940; Indian Stamp Act, 1899;
AIR1991Mad284
Mr. Radhakrishnan, ;Adv., for Massra D'Souza and ;Radhakrishan, Adv.
ORDER1. On 4-3-1988 the plaintiff filed the O. P. No. 197 of 1988 under Ss. 222 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with O. XXV, Rule 4 of the Original Side Rules. In...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.S. Robert and A.S. Arokiaraj, Trustees and Representatives of Cathol ...
Chennai
Apr-29-2003
Trusts and SocietiesCivil
Trust Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 92
(2003)2MLJ254
T.R. Mani, Sr. Counsel for ;K. Srinivasan, Adv.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The question regarding administration of a church, to be precise, a Catholic Church, by name, St. Mary Magdalin Church situate in a village called, Vakkampatti in Dindigul taluk is the subject matter of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.S. Rajagopalan, Vs. A. Mohammad Ali
Chennai
Oct-23-2002
Property
Evidence Act - Sections 92
(2003)1MLJ199
T.R. Mani, Sr. Counsel for ;T.M. Hariharan, Adv.
1. Defendants in O.S.No.1/1997 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur, are the appellants in the second appeal. The respondent herein filed the suit for a preliminary decree, directing the defendants to pay a sum...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »