Advanced Search Results
Supradip Roy Vs. Miss Mamata Banerjee and ors.
Kolkata
May-22-1998
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1, 2 and 3), 21 and 226;; Calcutta High Court's Writ Rules - Rule 27
(1998)2CALLT486(HC)
Mr. Supradip Roy, Adv.
1. It is the contention of the petitioner that the Respondent No. 1 has been served with notice of hearing of the instant application upon the personal assistant of Respondent No. 1, namely Mr. Dilip Majumdar,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPranab Chatterjee and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-22-1999
Civil
National Highway Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2D(1) and 3(A, C and D(1))
(2000)2CALLT47(HC),2000(1)CHN315
Mr. Supradip Roy, ;Mr. D.N. Bose and ;Mr. Aniruddha Sen, Advs.
M.H.S. Ansari, J. 1. The Instant appeal is directed against an order dated 19.3.99 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court, whereby andwhereunder the writ application filed by the appellants herein was dismissed in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›