Advanced Search Results

Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Courts

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Article 12

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal; Mr. Sanjai K. Pathak, Advs.

1. On 14th March, 2011, the first date of hearing, the following order was passed:- "WP (C) No. 1651/2011 Heard Mr.Sudhir Chandra, learned senior counsel along with Mr.Manish Bishnoi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Atul...

H.G. Gupta and Sons Vs. Messrs Silvertone Motors Private Limited and o ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 111, 113, 116 and 116(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 12, Rule 6

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT441

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Chandra Aggrawala, Sr. Adv.,; Vikas Dhawan and; Abhi

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.IA 4236/2006 (Under Order 12 Rule 6, CPC)1. This is an application filed on behalf of the plaintiff seeking judgment on admissions in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants for directing...

Gopal Singh Vs. Indian Railway Const. Company Ltd.(ircon)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ845Del

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Senior Adv. and; Mr. R.K. Saini, Adv; M

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. There are five petitioners in CWP. 629/98. Their services have been dispensed with by the Indian Railway Construction Company Limited, hereinafter called the IRCON. They have challenged the orders passed by the first...

M/S Gufic Ltd. and Another Vs Clinique Laboratories, Llc and anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - order 39 rule 1,Section 124(1)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, Sr ; Mr Abhinav Vasisht ; Ms Harshita Priyanka ; Mr Debojyoti Bhattacharya ; Mr Sumit Singh Benipal ; Ms Girija V. Verma, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment YES2. To be referred to the Reporter or not YES3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest YES ORDER1. This appeal is...

Anjan Kumar Singhi and anr. Vs. Ranjan Kumar Singhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 (CPC) - Section 151 - Order 7 Rule 11; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 49, 59, 60; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 300, 301; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 10

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sudhir Chandra; Mr. Sandeep Mahapatra; Mr. Aditya Ganju, Advs.

1. This litigation commenced in this Court pursuant to the filing of CS(OS) No.2615/2008 by Shri Ranjan Kumar Singhi and his wife, Smt. Taruna Singhi, who we shall hereinafter refer to as the Plaintiffs. The Prayers...

Nippon Steel Corporation Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 11-B (1), (4), 57, 21

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sudhir Chandra And Ors.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes ORDERC.M. APPL No. 1695/2011Exemption...

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri Sunil Kumar and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 323, 341 read with 34

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sudhir Chandra; Mr. Rajinder Dhawan; Ms.Shafaali Dhawan, Advs.

1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? YES2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? YES 3 Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? YES1. Calling in...

Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3(3-C); Levy Sugar Price Equalisation Fund Act, 1976

Reported in : 2001(59)DRJ197

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Trideep Pais, Adv

ORDERVijender Jain, J. 1. Rule.2. This writ petition can be disposed of at this stage. This is an off-shoot of the writ petition originally filed by the petitioners before the Allahabad High Court for the crushing...

Bda Private Limited Vs. Paul P. John and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trademarks Act, 1999 - Sections 11(1), 12, 21, 28(3), 30(2), 47, 57 to 60, 124, 124(1), 125, 150(1) and 150(3); Trademark Rules 2002 - Rules 11, 11(5), 25(19) and 92; Patent Rules, 2003 - Rules 25(19), 47, 47(2) and 47(6); Evidence Act - Sections 21(1) and 58; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 111

Reported in : LC2008(2)304; 2008(37)PTC41(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv.,; Mohit Lahoti and; Sanjay S. Chab

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. The plaintiff has filed this application under Section 124 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act') praying for an order that the present suit be stayed pending...

Neha BhasIn Vs. Anand Raj Anand and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39 - Rules 1, 2 and 4

Reported in : 132(2006)DLT196; 2006(32)PTC779(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv.,; Ashok Bhasin and; Tanuj Khurana

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. The plaintiff (Neha Bhasin), a singer, claims that her voice has been used by the defendants for the three versions1 of the song 'ek look ek look' in the forthcoming hindi feature...