Advanced Search Results

The Deputy Director, Land Acquisition Vs. Malla Atchinaidu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1968 - Sections 4(1), 6(1), 9(1), 13A, 17(4), 18, 23(1), 23(2), 23A(1), 28 and 54; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Evidence Act - Sections 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115, 151, 152 and 189 - Order 8, Rule 5

Reported in : AIR2007SC740; JT2007(3)SC18; (2006)12SCC87

Advocate for Appellant : S. Sundervardhan, Sr. Adv.,; Manoj Saxena,; Rajnish Kr. Sing

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted in SLP (C) No. 16443 of 1994.2. The appellant in Civil Appeal Nos. 6497-6500 of 1994 is the Deputy Director Land Acquisition and the respondents are Malla Atchinaidu and Ors. These...

Beasa Thakur Vs. State of H.P. Through Secretary Technical Education V ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Education

1. The petitioner, by means of this petition, has laid challenge to the order, dated 1st September, 2012, Annexure P2, whereby she has been transferred from Mandi to Jogindernagar. 2. The main grievance of the petitioner...

Kesri Devi Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services Pension Rules - Rules 3 and 13

Reported in : 113(2004)DLT135; 2004(76)DRJ124

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Mahajan and; Kamlesh Mahajan, Advs

Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. Rule.With the consent of the parties, writ petition is taken up for disposal.2. By this writ petition, petitioner seeks directions to respondent-MCD to immediately release all retiral benefits as also monthly pension...

Jyoti Parkash Vs. Kamal Kant

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

DEEPAK GUPTA, J (Oral) 1. The following interesting question of law arises for determination in this petition: Whether once a suit has abated, a Court is powerless to issue an injunction under Order 39 Rules 1...

Anil Kumar and ors. Vs. Makhan Singh Grewal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : TenancyLimitation

Acts : The Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 15

Reported in : (2006)144PLR26

Advocate for Appellant : Amit Rawal, Adv.

Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.1. The short question that falls for consideration by this Court in this revision petition is, whether the appellate authority was justified in declining the prayer of the petitioner-tenants for condonation of delay...

Samtel Workers Union (Bms) Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 6 and 10; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 13A; ;Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1956

Reported in : (2001)ILLJ632HP

Advocate for Appellant : Subhash Sharma, Adv.

C.K. Thakker, C.J. 1. This petition is filed by Samtel Workers Union (BMS), Parwanoo ('Union', for short), through its Secretary, for an appropriate writ, direction or order quashing and setting aside Certified Standing Orders, if any,...

Lachmi Devi Vs. H.P.S.E.B. and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009HP66

ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. The appellant was plaintiff in Civil Suit No. 94/88 which was dismissed by learned Sub-Judge 1st Class, Sundernagar on 28-12-1991, she filed Civil Appeal No. 88 of 1992, which was dismissed by learned...

Hitender Kumar Sharma and. Vs. State of H.P. and anr. anr

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Subhash Sharma, Adv.

1. This is a petition for review. It appears that the writ petition was posted along with batch of cases pertaining to regularization/conferment of work charge status of the daily waged Blears. As a matter of...

Hitender Kumar Sharma and anr. Vs. State of H.P. and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Subhash Sharma, Adv.

1. This is a petition for review. It appears that the writ petition was posted along with batch of cases pertaining to regularization/conferment of work charge status of the daily waged Beldars. As a matter of...

Jai NaraIn and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : AIR1996SC697; JT1995(9)SC323; 1995(6)SCALE664; (1996)1SCC9; [1995]Supp5SCR769

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.S. Vasisht

ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. These transfer cases are the writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India which were filed before the Delhi High Court. The petitioners have challenged the notifications dated January 6, 1995...