Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr sorabji · Page 1 of about 79 results (0.050 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 20 1959

Pukhraj Champalal JaIn Vs. D.R. Kohli

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-20-1959

Subject : CustomsConstitution

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR1230

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sorabji

Tambe, J.1. One of the questions raised in this application relates to the constitutionality of Section 178A of the Sea Customs Act (Act VIII of 1878) and, therefore, a notice was issued to the Attorney General....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1967

Shah and Co., Bombay Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-06-1967

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 - Sections 6; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 15(1); Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : (1968)70BOMLR119; 1968MhLJ395(SC); [1967]3SCR466

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sorabji

Vaidialingam J. 1. In this writ petition, under Art. 32, the petitioner seeks to have quashed, the proceedings taken by the respondents by way of requisitioning the premises, in question, and also to have the requisition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 1989

Jaishri Engineering Co. (P) Ltd., Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bom ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-02-1989

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11-A, 34, 34-A, 35-C and 35-L

Reported in : AIR1989SC1218; 1989(40)ELT214(SC); JT1989(1)SC500; 1989(1)SCALE602; (1989)2SCC439; [1989]1SCR870; 1989(2)LC52(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sorabji

Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 35-L of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the order dated 31.10.1988 passed by the Customs, Excise & Gold...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 29 2000

Dabur India Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-29-2000

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2000)(72)ECC648

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sorabji

1. This is an appeal filed by M/s Dabur India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'M/s. Dabur'), being aggrieved with the Order-in-Original dated 26.11.1997 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-I. The matter relates to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1976

D.H. Maniar Vs. Waman Laxman Kudav

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-24-1976

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR533

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sorabji

Untwalia, J.1. The appellants in this appeal by special leave had filed an application under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882-hereinafter referred to as the S.C.C. Act, against the respondent to compel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1976

D.H. Maniar and ors. Vs. Waman Laxman Kudav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-24-1976

Subject : Property

Acts : Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52, 62 and 63; Bombay Rent Act - Sections 15A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1976SC2340; (1976)4SCC118; [1977]1SCR403

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sorabji

N.L. Untwalia, J.1. The appellants in this appeal by special leave had filed an application under Section 41 of The Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882-hereinafter referred to as the S.C.C. Act, against the respondent to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1980

Mehta Teja Singh and Company Vs. Grindlays Bank Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-20-1980

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 43 Rule 1, Order 41 Rule 5, Order 21 Rule 30

Reported in : (1982)3SCC199

Y.V. Chandrachud, C.J.,; E.S. Venkataramiah and; D.A. Desai, JJ.1. Heard counsel. Special leave granted.2. It is true that the appeal is directed against an order passed by the High Court, which is of an interlocutory nature....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1967

Bibi Batool and ors. Vs. the Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Bombay ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-23-1967

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 105 and 105-B; Maharashtra Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1972Bom254; (1972)74BOMLR22

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Chagla, Adv., i/b., ;Gagrat & Co., ;M.M. Bhagadia, Attorneys, ;S.J. Sorabji, Adv. and ;V.R. Chhatrapati, Adv., i/b., ;Chhatrapati and Co., Attorneys

Mody, J.1. Orders of eviction have been passed against the petitioners in these three petitions in respect of 'corporation premises' under the special provisions contained in Chap. V - A of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1979

M.L. Nohria Vs. the General Insurance Corporation of India, Bombay and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-26-1979

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 19(1); General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act. 1972 - Sections 9 and 10; General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Societies Registration Act; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 3(4); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 16 and 226; General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Ordinance, 1971

Reported in : AIR1979P& H183

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jawahar Lal Gupta

S.S. Sandhawalia, C.J.1. Whether the National Insurance Company Limited is ''a State'' for the purposes of Art. 12, or a statutory Corporation amenable to the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1972

Bombay Gas Co. Ltd. Vs. Jagan Nath Pandurang and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-22-1972

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 133(1)

Reported in : AIR1972SC2356; [1975(31)FLR166]; 1973LabIC486; (1972)IILLJ52SC; (1972)2SCC119; [1972]3SCR929

Advocate for Appellant : Soli Sorabji,; K.D. Mehta,; P.C. Bhartari and;

C.A. Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal, on certificate, by the Bombay Gas Co. Ltd. is directed against the judgment and order dated February 6, 1967 of the Bombay High Court in Special Civil Application No. 1987 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial