Advanced Search Results
Pukhraj Champalal JaIn Vs. D.R. Kohli
Mumbai
Mar-20-1959
CustomsConstitution
(1959)61BOMLR1230
Mr. Sorabji
Tambe, J.1. One of the questions raised in this application relates to the constitutionality of Section 178A of the Sea Customs Act (Act VIII of 1878) and, therefore, a notice was issued to the Attorney General....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShah and Co., Bombay Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-06-1967
Tenancy
Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 - Sections 6; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 15(1); Constitution of India - Article 19(1)
(1968)70BOMLR119; 1968MhLJ395(SC); [1967]3SCR466
Mr. Sorabji
Vaidialingam J. 1. In this writ petition, under Art. 32, the petitioner seeks to have quashed, the proceedings taken by the respondents by way of requisitioning the premises, in question, and also to have the requisition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaishri Engineering Co. (P) Ltd., Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bom ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-02-1989
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11-A, 34, 34-A, 35-C and 35-L
AIR1989SC1218; 1989(40)ELT214(SC); JT1989(1)SC500; 1989(1)SCALE602; (1989)2SCC439; [1989]1SCR870; 1989(2)LC52(SC)
Mr. Sorabji
Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 35-L of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the order dated 31.10.1988 passed by the Customs, Excise & Gold...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dabur India Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-29-2000
Excise
(2000)(72)ECC648
Mr. Sorabji
1. This is an appeal filed by M/s Dabur India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'M/s. Dabur'), being aggrieved with the Order-in-Original dated 26.11.1997 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-I. The matter relates to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.H. Maniar Vs. Waman Laxman Kudav
Mumbai
Aug-24-1976
Tenancy
(1976)78BOMLR533
Mr. Sorabji
Untwalia, J.1. The appellants in this appeal by special leave had filed an application under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882-hereinafter referred to as the S.C.C. Act, against the respondent to compel...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.H. Maniar and ors. Vs. Waman Laxman Kudav
Supreme Court of India
Aug-24-1976
Property
Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52, 62 and 63; Bombay Rent Act - Sections 15A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115
AIR1976SC2340; (1976)4SCC118; [1977]1SCR403
Mr. Sorabji
N.L. Untwalia, J.1. The appellants in this appeal by special leave had filed an application under Section 41 of The Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882-hereinafter referred to as the S.C.C. Act, against the respondent to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMehta Teja Singh and Company Vs. Grindlays Bank Limited
Supreme Court of India
Mar-20-1980
Civil
Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 43 Rule 1, Order 41 Rule 5, Order 21 Rule 30
(1982)3SCC199
Y.V. Chandrachud, C.J.,; E.S. Venkataramiah and; D.A. Desai, JJ.1. Heard counsel. Special leave granted.2. It is true that the appeal is directed against an order passed by the High Court, which is of an interlocutory nature....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBibi Batool and ors. Vs. the Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Bombay ...
Mumbai
Aug-23-1967
Constitution
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 105 and 105-B; Maharashtra Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
AIR1972Bom254; (1972)74BOMLR22
S.C. Chagla, Adv., i/b., ;Gagrat & Co., ;M.M. Bhagadia, Attorneys, ;S.J. Sorabji, Adv. and ;V.R. Chhatrapati, Adv., i/b., ;Chhatrapati and Co., Attorneys
Mody, J.1. Orders of eviction have been passed against the petitioners in these three petitions in respect of 'corporation premises' under the special provisions contained in Chap. V - A of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.L. Nohria Vs. the General Insurance Corporation of India, Bombay and ...
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-26-1979
Company
Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 19(1); General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act. 1972 - Sections 9 and 10; General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Societies Registration Act; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 3(4); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 16 and 226; General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Ordinance, 1971
AIR1979P& H183
Mr. Jawahar Lal Gupta
S.S. Sandhawalia, C.J.1. Whether the National Insurance Company Limited is ''a State'' for the purposes of Art. 12, or a statutory Corporation amenable to the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBombay Gas Co. Ltd. Vs. Jagan Nath Pandurang and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-22-1972
Property
Constitution of India - Article 133(1)
AIR1972SC2356; [1975(31)FLR166]; 1973LabIC486; (1972)IILLJ52SC; (1972)2SCC119; [1972]3SCR929
Soli Sorabji,; K.D. Mehta,; P.C. Bhartari and;
C.A. Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal, on certificate, by the Bombay Gas Co. Ltd. is directed against the judgment and order dated February 6, 1967 of the Bombay High Court in Special Civil Application No. 1987 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »