Advanced Search Results

The Executive Engineer Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Collector ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sonwalkar

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and learned counsel for respondent No. 3-A. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard finally. 3. During pendency of...

Shri Dnyandevrao Tatyrav Waghmode Vs. Allabaksha Gulab Nadaf and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 499, 501 and 502

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR398; 1999BomCR(Cri)398; 1999CriLJ1754

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Mundari and ;K.B. Sonwalkar, Advs.;Mrs. Usha Kejariwal and ;R.Y. Mirza, Addl. P.P.

ORDERDr. Mrs. Pratibha Upasani, J. 1. This Criminal Revision Application along with Criminal Appeal will be disposed of by this common judgment and order. 2. Criminal Revision Application No. 42 of 1992, which was converted from...

Anna Babu Sul and Another Vs. Laxman Pandurang Tiwatne (Since Deceased ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 29, 32-G and 84; Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Reported in : 1998(1)ALLMR269; 1998(5)BomCR301; 1998(1)MhLj614

Advocate for Appellant : K.B. Sonwalkar, Adv.

ORDERT.K. Chandrashekhara Das, J.1. The petitioners challenge the order passed in revision by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in proceedings No. MRT.SH.VI. 6/81 (TEN.B. 185/81) : Pune dated 13th April, 1983 wherein the revision application filedby respondents...

Rakesh Balasaheb Landge, Taluka and District Beed Vs. Maharashtra Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

JUDGMENT (Per U.D. Salvi, J.). 1. Heard. Perused petition along with annexures thereto, affidavit-in-reply and the record produced by the respondents. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by mutual consent of parties. 3. Articles...

Rakesh Balasaheb Landge, Taluka and District Beed Vs. Maharashtra Stat ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

JUDGMENT (Per U.D. Salvi, J.). 1. Heard. Perused petition along with annexures thereto, affidavit-in-reply and the record produced by the respondents. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by mutual consent of parties. 3. Articles...

Smt. Jaitunbi Mubarak Shaikh Vs. Mubarak FakruddIn Shaikh and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3(1), 4, 5, and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 127, 128, 308 and 310; Wakf Act, 1954 - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1898 - Sections 488; Mulla's Principles of Mohamedan Law - Sections 2 and 250; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965

Reported in : 2000(1)BomCR696; 1999(3)MhLj694

Advocate for Appellant : K.B. Sonwalkar Adv.

ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. This criminal writ petition is filed by a divorced muslim woman. In view of the reference to a Division Bench by T.K. Chandrasekhara Das, J., the following questions of law arise for our...

Smt. Jaitunbi Mubarak Shaikh Vs. Mubarak FakruddIn Shaikh and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 7, 8 and 31(1); Wakf Act, 1954 - Sections 9; Orissa Forest Produce (Control of Trade) Act, 1981; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 to 128; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 488; Muslim Personal Law

Reported in : 1999CriLJ3846

Advocate for Appellant : K.B. Sonwalkar, Adv.;A.R. Kamath, Addl. P.P.

A.V. Savant, J.1. This Criminal Writ Petition is filed by a divorced Muslim woman. In view of the reference to a Division Bench by T.K. Chandrasekhara Das, J. the following questions of law arise for our...

Shri Appasaheb Dadasaheb Mohite (Deceased Through Heirs Vasant Appalah ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 32G, 32P, 74 and 74(2); Maharashtra Land Revenue Code; Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 - Sections 18(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR94; 2004(6)BomCR716; 2004(4)MhLj269

Advocate for Appellant : Vishwanath Talkute, Adv.

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. All these three writ petitions can be disposed of by common judgment. The land in question is an agricultural land bearing Survey No. 5 and 11/C situated at village Pimplat, Tal.Phaltan, District Satara....