Advanced Search Results
Seth Dhanoomal Parsaram Vs. P. Kuppuraj and anr.
Chennai
Mar-16-1976
Commercial
Indian Contract Act - Sections 129, 130 and 131
AIR1977Mad274; (1977)1MLJ86
Mr. Sivamani
Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. The first and the second defendants in O. S. No. 67 of 1968 on the file of the Subordinate Judge of Coimbatore are the appellants in A. S. No. 520 of 1972. This...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChinnappa Asari Vs. the Divisional Panchayat Officer
Chennai
Feb-24-1976
Civil
(1977)1MLJ328
Mr. Sivamani
T. Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. We shall first take C.M. A No. 583 of 1974. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned District Judge of Chingleput in O.P. No. 28 of 1968 on his...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPalaniammal Vs. S. Periasamy and ors.
Chennai
Apr-19-1985
Limitation
(1985)2MLJ156
ORDERM.N. Chandurkar, C.J.1. The only question which has been argued and which arises in this revision petition is whether the Execution Petition filed on 11th July, 1983 by the decree-holder is barred by limitation.2. A decree...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (Admn.) De ...
Chennai
Apr-19-1982
Trusts and Societies
Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 6(7) and 70; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 6, 17, 18t, 20, 21 and 115 - Order 7, Rule 10
AIR1982Mad417
C. Chinnaswamy, Addl. Govt. Pleader
ORDER1. The point that arises for consideration in this Civil Revision petition is :Whether the court in which the suit has been instituted for a declaration is maintainable inasmuch as the said Court has got jurisdiction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Nagappan Vs. H.A. Ramaswamy Chettiar and ors.
Chennai
Feb-06-1975
Sales Tax
[1975]36STC408(Mad)
N. Sivamani and ; T.G. Ramachandran, Advs.
Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. The fourth defendant is the appellant. The plaintiffs laid an action on a mortgage deed dated 27th September, 1957, marked as exhibit A-1 in the case, impleading defendants 1 to 3, who were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Tamil Nadu Vs. S. N. Thirugnanam and anr.
Chennai
Sep-04-1984
Direct Taxation
(1986)55CTR(Mad)431
ORDERSengottuvelan, J. - This is a revision by the State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Agrl. ITO, Tiruchirapalli, challenging the legality and correctness of the order of the Subordinate Judge, Karur, passed in I.A. No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPattammal Vs. M. Munuswami
Chennai
Feb-21-1966
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162 and 488; Evidence Act - Sections 21, 25 and 145
AIR1966Mad392; 1966CriLJ1275
Mr. Sivamani
ORDER(1) This revision case has been filed by the wife against the order of the learned Additional First Class Magistrate, Vellore, refusing maintenance to her under Sec. 488 Crl. P. C. on the ground that she...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madras Represented by Spl. Tahsildar Regional Engineering Col ...
Chennai
Nov-17-1969
PropertyLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 12(2); Civil Prcedure Code , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 1
AIR1970Mad353
G. Ramaswami, Addl. Govt. Pleader
ORDERRamamurti, J.1. In a batch of Land Acquisition cases, a common judgment was delivered by the trial Court. The State of Madras obtained 12 printed copies of judgment and filed an appeal which (for the sake...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChinnappa Gounder and anr. Vs. Valliammal
Chennai
Apr-10-1968
Family
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 6 and 8; Hindu Law; Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 19; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908
AIR1969Mad187
N. Sivamani, Adv.
Ismail, J.1. The two defendants in O. S. No. 357 of 1961 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif of Erode are the appellants before this Court and the plaintiff in the suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Ameeran Sahib and anr. Vs. Somanatha Nadar
Chennai
Oct-25-1972
Limitation
Limitation Act - Schedule - Articles 123, 124 and 164
AIR1973Mad308; (1973)1MLJ255
Mr. Narayanaswami, Mr. Sivamani
1. The defendants in the suit are the appellants in C. M. A. No. 187 of 1972 and the petitioners in C. R. P. No. 1055 of 1972. The suit was filed against the defendants for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »