Advanced Search Results

Cooper Engineering Limited Vs. D.M. Aney and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1973SC2232; [1973(26)FLR428]; (1973)IILLJ301SC; (1974)3SCC187; [1974]1SCR240a

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shroff

C.A. Vaidialingam, J.1. By order dated January 25, 1969, the State of Maharashtra referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Bombay, for adjudication three disputes between the appellant and its workmen. The said disputes were registered by the...

Jayantilal Thankkar and Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9(1); Central Excise Rules - Rule 209A

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR543; 2006(195)ELT9(Bom); 2005(3)MhLj282; 2007[8]STR312

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shroff

V.C. Daga, J.1. Whether Auditors of the Company could be subjected to the action under section 9(1)(bbb) of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 ('Act') Act read with rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules...

Glaxo Laboratories (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3; Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Central Excises Act; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948

Reported in : 1984(3)ECC255; 1985(21)ELT72(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shroff

1. Messrs Glaxo Laboratories (India) Ltd. are the manufacturers of a number of pharmaceutical and chemical preparations and medicines. The petitioners import a substance known as Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone (also known as 'P.V.P.') which is required by...

Shri Vivekanand Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10 and 10A

Reported in : AIR1984SC1779; 1984(2)SCALE178; (1984)4SCC19; 1984(16)LC838(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. P. Shroff, Mrs. Shroff

1 This appeal by certificate under Article 133(1)(a) of the Constitution granted by the High Court of Gujarat is directed against the judgment of the High Court dismissing the Special Civil Application 629/64 filed by the...

Atul Products Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 27 and 27(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4; Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1986(1)BomCR572; 1985(22)ELT714(Bom); 1986MhLJ554

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shroff

1. The petitioners carry on business, inter alia, of manufacturing dye-stuffs and dye-intermediates. In the manufacture of dye-stuffs and dye-intermediates one of the raw materials used is a product known as 'Naphthalene'. The main commercial source...

Sevantilal Karsondas Modi Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1979SC705; 1979CriLJ645; 1979CENCUS196D; (1979)2SCC58; [1979]2SCR1160; 1979(11)LC702(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shroff

A.D. Koshal and; S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, JJ.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant. The appellant was...

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Dadu Jagdish Prasad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1971)3SCC804

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shroff

A.N. GROVER, J.1. This is an appeal by certificate from a Judgment and decree of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. In 1927 the Maharaja of the erstwhile Rewa State granted to the respondent a revenue-free grant...

Hcl Ltd., in Re Hcl Hewlett-packard Ltd., in Re

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 101(2), 391, 391(2), 393 and 394A

Reported in : [1994]80CompCas228(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shroff

Arun B. Saharya, J. 1. An application, being C.A. No. 428 of 1991 was filed on May 29, 1991, by the petitioners under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'),...

Dawn Apparels Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(4); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10

Reported in : 1989(23)LC505(Bombay); 1989(43)ELT401(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shroff

1. This writ petition concerns the application of Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, as it stood prior to the amendment which came into force on 1st October, 1975.2. The petitioners are...

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Commissioner of Customs Vs. Hoganas I ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 6, 9, 8, 18, 19, 28, 28(1), 37(2), 111, 112, 113, 114, 114A, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 124, 123, 125, 125(2), 127A, 127B, 127B(1), 127C(1), 127C(3), 127C(6), 127C(7), 127C(9), 127C(11), 127D, 127E, 127H, 127H(1), 127H(3), 127I(1) and 245A; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs (Amendment) Act, 1998; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245C, 245C(1), 245D and 245D(1); Finance Act - Sections 13; Customs Rules - Rules 10, 10A and 18A; Customs (Settlement of Cases) Rules 1999; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Indian Penal Code; Income Tax Law

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR61; 2006(199)ELT8(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : A.J. Rana, Sr. Counsel, ;P.S. Jetley and ;K.R. Chaudhary, Advs. in W.P. No. 115/2004, ;A.J. Rana, Sr. Counsel and ;K.J. Presswala, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 1636 and 9995/2004, ;V. Shreedharan, Sr. Counsel an

S. Radakrishnan,J.1. In all the above ten Petitions, common issue has been raised with regard to the jurisdiction of the Settlement Commission constituted under Chapter XIV-A of the Customs Act, 1962. The Petitioners in the five...