Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Commissioner of Customs Vs. Hoganas I ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 6, 9, 8, 18, 19, 28, 28(1), 37(2), 111, 112, 113, 114, 114A, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 124, 123, 125, 125(2), 127A, 127B, 127B(1), 127C(1), 127C(3), 127C(6), 127C(7), 127C(9), 127C(11), 127D, 127E, 127H, 127H(1), 127H(3), 127I(1) and 245A; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs (Amendment) Act, 1998; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245C, 245C(1), 245D and 245D(1); Finance Act - Sections 13; Customs Rules - Rules 10, 10A and 18A; Customs (Settlement of Cases) Rules 1999; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Indian Penal Code; Income Tax Law

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR61; 2006(199)ELT8(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : A.J. Rana, Sr. Counsel, ;P.S. Jetley and ;K.R. Chaudhary, Advs. in W.P. No. 115/2004, ;A.J. Rana, Sr. Counsel and ;K.J. Presswala, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 1636 and 9995/2004, ;V. Shreedharan, Sr. Counsel an

S. Radakrishnan,J.1. In all the above ten Petitions, common issue has been raised with regard to the jurisdiction of the Settlement Commission constituted under Chapter XIV-A of the Customs Act, 1962. The Petitioners in the five...

Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28, 110, 111, 111, 111, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 123, 127A, 127A(b), 127B and 144A; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245C and 245D

Reported in : 2006(201)ELT529(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : A.J. Rana, Sr. Counsel, ;P.S. Jetley, ;K.R. Chaudhary, ;K.J. Presswala, ;V. Shreedharan, Sr. Counsel, ;Prakash Shah, ;Jitu Motwani, ;Bharat Raichandani i/by PDS Legal, ;C. Harishankar, Sr. Counsel, ;

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. In all the above ten Petitions, common issue has been raised with regard to the jurisdiction of the Settlement Commission constituted under Chapter XIV-A of the Customs Act, 1962). The Petitioners in the...

The Commissioner of Customs (E.P.) Vs. Jupiter Exports and (3) ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Preservation of Smuggling Activities Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(26), 28 and 130(A); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR757; (2007)109BOMLR1138; 2007(119)ECC395; 2007LC395(Bombay)

Advocate for Appellant : Hina Shah, ;D.B. Shroff and ;Shilpa Balani, Advs. i/b., ;Yogesh Rohira, Adv.

Vijay C. Daga, J.1. These are two proceedings, one is Customs Application under Section 130(A) of the Customs a1962, ('the Act' for short) at the instance of the Commissioner of Customs (E.P.) ('the Revenue' for short)...

Mahabanoo Navroz Kotwal Vs. Piloo Fali Bomanji and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

A. Introduction 1. This probate action is unusual in many respects. For one thing, its size: the trial record alone is nearly 2000 pages, not counting the files of miscellaneous papers, interim applications and so on....

Bai Dahi and ors. Vs. Shankarbhai Deojibhai and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 9, Rule 9 - Order 32, Rule 9

Reported in : AIR1954Bom214; (1953)55BOMLR944; ILR1954Bom330

Advocate for Appellant : H.R. Gokhale, Adv.

Chagla, C.J. 1. The petitioners before me are minors and they filed the suit, being suit No. 216 of 1945-46, by their next friend, the mother in the Court of the Second Joint Civil Judge, Junior...

Cooper Engineering Limited Vs. D.M. Aney and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1973SC2232; [1973(26)FLR428]; (1973)IILLJ301SC; (1974)3SCC187; [1974]1SCR240a

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shroff

C.A. Vaidialingam, J.1. By order dated January 25, 1969, the State of Maharashtra referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Bombay, for adjudication three disputes between the appellant and its workmen. The said disputes were registered by the...

Mervanji Mancherji Cama Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Counci ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1912)14BOMLR654

Basil Scott, Kt., C.J.1. The plaintiffs sue for a declaration that land of which they are mortgagees is as between them and their mortgagor on the one hand and the Secretary of State on the other...

The State of Maharashtra Through Manikpur Police Station Vs. Dilip Pre ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 149, 302, 307, 376, 376(2) 380 and 452 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 235(2), 354(3) and 428; Evidence Act - Sections 118

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR2453

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Borulkar, Public Prosecutor and ;A.R. Patil (APP)

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The above confirmation case has been filed by the State of Maharashtra seeking confirmation of death penalty imposed upon the original Accused Nos.1 to 3 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, by his...

Jayantilal Thankkar and Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9(1); Central Excise Rules - Rule 209A

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR543; 2006(195)ELT9(Bom); 2005(3)MhLj282; 2007[8]STR312

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shroff

V.C. Daga, J.1. Whether Auditors of the Company could be subjected to the action under section 9(1)(bbb) of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 ('Act') Act read with rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules...

Shripad Shivaram Kulkarni Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Miscellaneous

Reported in : (1982)2SCC174

S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, J.- 1. Let this petition be treated as review petition.  2. We have read the petition and heard Mr Shroff, counsel for the State. It appears that in this case, special leave...