Advanced Search Results

Lave Narendrasinhji Jagatsinhji Vaghela Vs. O.L. of Kalol Mills Ltd. a ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CompanyProperty

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 130; Gujarat Land Revenue Rules - Rule 108

Reported in : [2005]60SCL24(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Navin K. Pahwa, Adv. in Company Application No. 324 of 1994

K.A. Puj, J.1. Company Application No. 324/94 is filed by one Mr. Narendrasinhji Jagatsinhji Vaghela, seeking direction to the Official Liquidator of Kalol Mills Limited, Kalol to return back to the applicant, possession of that portion...

Cwp No. 6485 of 2008 (O/M) Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 9.1.2014 1. CWP No.6485 of 2008 (O/M) Suresh Kumar and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents 2. CWP No.12295...

Raj Pal vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Prashant Shukla, Mrs. Anushree Mishra, Mr. Digant D. Deo

$~2. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LA.APP. 387/2015 & CM No.20619/2015 (for condonation of 1610 days delay in filing the appeal). RAJ PAL .... Appellant Through: Mr. Prashant Shukla,...

Cwp No.13217 of 2007 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

CWP No.13217 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.13217 of 2007 Date of decision :30. 08.2013 Smt. Sawinder Kaur .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE...

Jagjit Singh @juj. Vs. State of Punjab and Others.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service Tax

CRM not M-19946 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. not M- 19946 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: November 26, 2012. Jagjit Singh @Juj.....PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab and others.....RESPONDENT...

Present:- Mr. Veneet Sharma Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

CRM M-18835 of 2014 [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM M-18835 of 2014 Date of Decision: August 7, 2014 Haramritpal Singh …..Petitioner versus State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI....

Ram Kishan Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : 62(1996)DLT252; 1996(38)DRJ63

Advocate for Appellant : Chetan Sharma,; Yogender Vashisht,; Madhu Tawetia and;

Dalveer Bhandari, J.(1) The petitioner has filed this application against the order dated 16th March, 1995 by which the revision petition Filed by the petitioner was dismissed. Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this...

Ajit Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-39912 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 18, 2014 Ajit Singh ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT...

Present: Mr. Shashikant Gupta Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13205-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.04.2014 Rubina Ali and another ...Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present: Mr.Shashikant...

M/s. Jay Construction Co. Vs. The Custodian of the Enemy Property and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dwarkadaslearned Senior Counsel

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. In view of the earlier orders passed by this Court, we have, with the consent of parties, heard the Petition finally. 2. Hence, Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule made returnable...