Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr sen · Page 1 of about 2,507 results (0.375 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 12 1982

P.B. Samant and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-12-1982

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 3(1); Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 2; Maharashtra Cement (Licensing and Control) Order, 1973; Maharashtra Cement Control (Licensing and Control) (Amendment) Order, 1979

Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR367

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok H. Desai, ; N.H. Seervai, ; R. Iyar and ; D.H. Nanavati, Advs.

B. Lentin, J.1. The petitioners challenge the method of distribution of ad hoc cement in the State of Maharashtra as being contrary to the rule of law and probity in public life. Initially the petitioners has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2008

Venture Global Engineering Vs. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-10-2008

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 1, 1(2), 2, 2(1), 2(2), 2(3), 2(4), 2(5), 3, 5, 9, 17, 34, 44, 45, 48, 48(1), 48(3), 52, 53 and 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 108, 110 and 111A; Companies Rules

Reported in : AIR2008SC1061; 2008(2)ALD46(SC); 2008(3)ALLMR(SC)416; 2008(1)ARBLR137(SC); 2008BusLR102(SC); (2008)1CompLJ224(SC); 2008(1)CTC348; JT2008(1)SC468; 2008(4)MhLj579; (2008)2MLJ; 2008AIRSCW667; 2008(2)ICC693; 2008(1)SCALE214; (2008) 4 SCC 190

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv.,; Vinay Kumar Misra,; Rajat Tamni

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Leave granted. 2. Appellant - Venture Global Engineering (in short 'VGE'), a company incorporated in the United States of America with its principal office at 33662, James J Pampo Drive, Fraser, Michigan, USA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 1993

Amalgamated Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Nov-09-1993

Subject : Electricity

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ashok Sen

Aftab Alam, J.1. Petitioner No. 1 in this application is an industrial consumer of electrical energy; it gets its supply from the Bihar State Electricity Board ('the Board', for short) in terms of the High Tension...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 27 1994

William Grant and Sons Ltd. Vs. Mcdowell and Compay Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-27-1994

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : The Scotch Whisky Act, 1988; Scotch Whisky Order 1990; Indian Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 5, 19(2) and 92; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 2(2), 15 and 20; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(5); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)65; 55(1994)DLT80; 1994(30)DRJ105

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Sen,; S.K. Dholakia,; Parveen Anand,;

Mahinder Narain, J. (1) The plaintiff William Grant & Sons Ltd. has instituted the suit No.2532 of 1993 in this Court, seeking injunction against defendant McDowell & Co. Ltd. The plaintiff seeks to restrain infringement of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2011

Ms. Bee Pee Jay Finance Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central a ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-12-2011

Subject : Direct Taxation

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ananda Sen. Adv

1. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax (“Act”), 1961 is at the instance of an assessee and is directed against an order dated 16th July, 2003, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2001

CanfIn Homes Ltd. Vs. Lloyds Steel Industries Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-2001

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 434(1), 439, 528 and 529; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 47

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR901; 2001(4)BomCR84; [2001]106CompCas52(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Samdani and ;Lalit Jain, Advs., i/b., M. Dhruva and Co.

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. By a letter dated 24th February, 1992, the petitioner agreed to grant to the respondent-company in the present case. M/s. Lloyds Steel Industries Ltd., a term loan of Rs. 5.52 crores for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1983

State Bank of India Vs. Hegde and Golay Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-22-1983

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 433(3); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 18

Reported in : [1988]63CompCas581(Kar); ILR1987KAR2496

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Sundara Swamy, Adv.

Chandrakantraj Urs, J.1. This petition under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), by the State Bank of India, Bangalore (briefly 'the bank'), is for an order of this court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 1988

Ashok Gupta Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-10-1988

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 35(1988)DLT269; 1988RLR442

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Sen,; M.A. Rangaswamy,; R. Rangaswamy,;

Mahinder Narain, J. (1) This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by Ashok Gupta, for issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus and for the purpose of quashing the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 1969

Gem Palace, Jaipur and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-04-1969

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 141; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 5(1), 6(1), 16(1), 16(5), 16(7), 27(7), 27(8), 28 and 52

Reported in : AIR1970Raj225; 1969()WLN540

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Sen,; D.P. Gupta,; L.R. Bhansali,;

ORDERV.P. Tyagi, J.1. This is a group of 150 Writ petitions whereby the petitioners have challenged the validity of Sections 4, 5, 6, '8, 16, 18, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 44, 47,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 1949

Harimohan Dutt Vs. C.K. Sen and Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-08-1949

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Calcutta House Rent Control Order, 1943 - Section 9B; ; West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1948 - Section 11(1); ; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 105

Reported in : AIR1952Cal391

Advocate for Appellant : Niren De, Adv.

P.B. Mukherji, J.1. This is a suit by the plff. for the recovery of possession of the first floor & the three rooms in the ground floor in premises No. 60, Harrison Road, Calcutta, in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial