Advanced Search Results
S.S. Mehta (Captain) Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
May-27-1998
Service
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226
1998IVAD(Delhi)385; 74(1998)DLT42; 1998(46)DRJ617
Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv
ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated the 4th of August, 1994, wherein the Government of India confirmed the sentence imposed by the Court Martial which is in the following terms:-'SENTENCE The court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCivil Writ Petition No.651 of 1984 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.651 of 1 ...
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-11-2013
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.651 of 1984 Date of Decision : July 11, 2013 Bharat Singh and others .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVidya Singh Vs. L.i.C. of India and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
May-17-2004
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
IV(2006)ACC192
Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.1. The appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of amount of insurance claim for death of Joginder Singh.2. Case of the plaintiff is that plaintiffs deceased husband, Joginder Singh, was insured with Life...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Present: Mr. Anand Chhibbar Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Haryana ...
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-02-2013
Education
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16129 of 2010 Date of Decision:02. 04.2013 M/s Surendra Enterprises ….Petitioner versus State of Haryana & others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurta Singh Vs. Pritam Singh
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-25-1982
Limitation
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 8, 8(1) and 8(2); Indian Limitation Act, 1961 - Schedule - Article 60; Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 29; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 44; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 60; Indian Contract Act - Sections 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 32, Rule 7
AIR1983P& H114
S.S. Sandhawalia, C.J.1. Whether a transfer of immovable property by a natural guardian in contravention of Section 8 (1) and (2) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 can be challenged by way of a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSupreme Court Monitoring Committee Vs. Mussoorie Dehradun Development ...
Supreme Court of India
Nov-29-1996
EnvironmentCivil
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2, 2(ii); Forest Act, 1927
(1997)11SCC605
A.M. Ahmadi, C.J.,; Sujata V. Manohar and; K. Venkataswami, JJ.1. By our order dated 10-7-1996 we had passed an interim order to the effect that construction which has begun at the site but had not proceeded...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Godavari Devi Sehgal Vs. Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Jan-03-1991
Direct Taxation
(1992)40ITD71(Delhi)
1. This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated December 19, 1988, passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ["CIT (A)" for short].2. The only dispute arising in this appeal relates to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of C. Ex., Chandigarh-i Vs. Eastman Cast and Forge Ltd.
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-29-2002
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57Q; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H(1)
2002(141)ELT631(P& H)
Kamal Sehgal, Adv.
ORDERJawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. M/s. Eastman Cast & Forge Ltd., Ludhiana, is engaged in the manufacture of Hand Tools. It submitted its 'return' for the period from December, 1994 to March, 1995. It claimed Modvat credit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Maruti Udyog Limited
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-17-2009
Excise
2009(169)LC66(P& H); [2009]23STT55
M.M. Kumar, J. 1. This order shall dispose of C.E.A. Nos. 64 and 65 of 2009 as the issue raised in both the appeals is common. The facts are being taken from CEA No. 64 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Avon Cycles Ltd.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-19-2002
Excise
2002(82)ECC54
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The Revenue has filed this petition under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 with the prayer that the Tribunal be directed to refer the following two questions for the consideration...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »