Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr sehgal · Page 1 of about 105 results (0.054 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 27 1998

S.S. Mehta (Captain) Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-27-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : 1998IVAD(Delhi)385; 74(1998)DLT42; 1998(46)DRJ617

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated the 4th of August, 1994, wherein the Government of India confirmed the sentence imposed by the Court Martial which is in the following terms:-'SENTENCE The court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2013

Civil Writ Petition No.651 of 1984 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.651 of 1 ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-11-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.651 of 1984 Date of Decision : July 11, 2013 Bharat Singh and others .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2004

Vidya Singh Vs. L.i.C. of India and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-17-2004

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC192

Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.1. The appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of amount of insurance claim for death of Joginder Singh.2. Case of the plaintiff is that plaintiffs deceased husband, Joginder Singh, was insured with Life...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 02 2013

Present: Mr. Anand Chhibbar Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Haryana ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-02-2013

Subject : Education

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16129 of 2010 Date of Decision:02. 04.2013 M/s Surendra Enterprises ….Petitioner versus State of Haryana & others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1982

Surta Singh Vs. Pritam Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-25-1982

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 8, 8(1) and 8(2); Indian Limitation Act, 1961 - Schedule - Article 60; Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 29; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 44; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 60; Indian Contract Act - Sections 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 32, Rule 7

Reported in : AIR1983P& H114

S.S. Sandhawalia, C.J.1. Whether a transfer of immovable property by a natural guardian in contravention of Section 8 (1) and (2) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 can be challenged by way of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 1996

Supreme Court Monitoring Committee Vs. Mussoorie Dehradun Development ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-29-1996

Subject : EnvironmentCivil

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2, 2(ii); Forest Act, 1927

Reported in : (1997)11SCC605

A.M. Ahmadi, C.J.,; Sujata V. Manohar and; K. Venkataswami, JJ.1. By our order dated 10-7-1996 we had passed an interim order to the effect that construction which has begun at the site but had not proceeded...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 1991

Smt. Godavari Devi Sehgal Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-03-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1992)40ITD71(Delhi)

1. This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated December 19, 1988, passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ["CIT (A)" for short].2. The only dispute arising in this appeal relates to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2002

Commissioner of C. Ex., Chandigarh-i Vs. Eastman Cast and Forge Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-29-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57Q; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H(1)

Reported in : 2002(141)ELT631(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Kamal Sehgal, Adv.

ORDERJawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. M/s. Eastman Cast & Forge Ltd., Ludhiana, is engaged in the manufacture of Hand Tools. It submitted its 'return' for the period from December, 1994 to March, 1995. It claimed Modvat credit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2009

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Maruti Udyog Limited

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-17-2009

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2009(169)LC66(P& H); [2009]23STT55

M.M. Kumar, J. 1. This order shall dispose of C.E.A. Nos. 64 and 65 of 2009 as the issue raised in both the appeals is common. The facts are being taken from CEA No. 64 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2002

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Avon Cycles Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-19-2002

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2002(82)ECC54

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The Revenue has filed this petition under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 with the prayer that the Tribunal be directed to refer the following two questions for the consideration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial