Advanced Search Results

Shri Omprakash Durgaprasad SharmA. Vs. Ms. Pranali Chandrashekhar and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. RULE. By consent Rule made returnable forthwith. Ms. Rekha Shukla waives service of Rule on behalf of Respondents. Petition taken up for final hearing on Board. 2. I have heard Mr. Dani, Advocate for the...

Ajay Gupta Vs. State Thr. C.B.I

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Saxena

Vipin Sanghi, J. Crl.M.A. No. 13414/2016 1. Issue notice. Ms. Behura, SPP for CBI, accepts notice. 2. I have heard the submission of learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for CBI at...

Tulsi Ram vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Saxena

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Crl. A. No.1146/2016 Judgment reserved on:13. h February, 2017 Judgment pronounced on:6th March, 2017 TULSI RAM STATE Through: Mr. O.P.Saxena, Advocate. versus ........

Rajendra Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Election

Reported in : 2007(3)MPHT70

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Saxena

ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. The petitioner is a Member of Primary Krishi Sakh Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Atarikhejda, District Vidisha, which is a primary co-operative society registered under the M.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (for short 'the Act')....

N.K. Saxena and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : 2008(2)MPHT365

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ankit Saxena, Mr. Saxena

ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. The petitioner No. 1 is a practicing Advocate and practices mainly in co-operative matters. He is also the Vice President of the Bar Association of M.P. State Co-operative Tribunal. The petitioner No. 2...

Gopal Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) - Sections 8, 18

Reported in : AIR2002SC2337; 2002(2)Crimes168(SC); JT2001(10)SC543; (2002)9SCC595

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Saxena

A.S. Anand, C.J.,; R.C. Lahoti and; Ashok Bhan, JJ.1. This appeal by special leave assails the judgment and order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh (Indore Bench) dated 23-6-1999 vide which conviction and sentence of...

Union of India vs.vinod Ashwini Saxena & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Maninder Acharya, Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Mr. Ajay Kumar Tandon, Ms. Purnima Singh, Mr. Sudhir Walia, Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Mr. Dewesh Singh, Mr. Sukriti Ghai, Mr. Devesh Singh, Ms. Sukriti Ghar, Mr. Rahul Adhana

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h November, 2019 Decided on:2. d December, 2019 W.P. (C) 5954/2016 & CM245362016 (stay) UNION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG...

Sidharth Zutshi vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Maninder Acharya, Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Mr. Ajay Kumar Tandon, Ms. Purnima Singh, Mr. Sudhir Walia, Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Mr. Dewesh Singh, Mr. Sukriti Ghai, Mr. Devesh Singh, Ms. Sukriti Ghar, Mr. Rahul Adhana

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h November, 2019 Decided on:2. d December, 2019 W.P. (C) 5954/2016 & CM245362016 (stay) UNION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG...

Sanjeet Ram @ Sanjeet vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. O.P. Saxena

s$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:28. h November, 2016 + CRL.A. 1027/2016 & Crl.M.(Bail) 1934/2016 SANJEET RAM @ SANJEET ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. O.P. Saxena, Adv. STATE versus...

Suresh Chand Talera Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 4(1), 10, 64(1A), 133A, 145, 145(2), 146 and 260A; Finance Act, 1973; Finance Act, 1996 - Sections 2; Essencial Dispute Act - Sections 6 and 16; Constitution of India - Article 366(9)

Reported in : (2006)201CTR(MP)153; [2006]282ITR341(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena and ;Sunil Verma, Advs.

1. This is an appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961.2. The relevant facts briefly are that the appellant carries on inter alia, the business of purchase and sale of silver and gold ornaments...