Advanced Search Results
Mr Lalit Kumar Modi Through His Constituted Attorn Vs. the Board of Co ...
Delhi
Sep-24-2013
Land Acquisition
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + F.A.O. No.373 of 2013 Decided on :24. h September, 2013 MR LALIT KUMAR MODI THROUGH HIS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY SHRI MEHMOOD M ABDI .....Appellant Through: Mr.A.M.Singhvi and Parag...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Board of Control for Cricket in India Vs. Mr Lalit Kumar Modi and ...
Delhi
Sep-24-2013
Land Acquisition
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + F.A.O. No.373 of 2013 Decided on :24. h September, 2013 MR LALIT KUMAR MODI THROUGH HIS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY SHRI MEHMOOD M ABDI .....Appellant Through: Mr.A.M.Singhvi and Parag...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiv Kumar Vs. Collector and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-09-2001
ElectionCivil
Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 17, 17(1), 19, 26, 33, 36, 37, 38, 92, 98 and 122; Madhya Pradesh Nirvachan Niyam, 1995 - Rules 81, 83 and 90; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Election Petitions, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification of Membership) Rules, 1995 - Rule 2
2001(5)MPHT619; 2001(2)MPLJ464
Sanjay Patel, Adv.
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Election for the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kheri was held in accordance with the provisions enshrined under Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and one Rajesh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Thaman Barmaiya Vs. Smt. Shashi Karna and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-20-2000
Election
Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 122; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat (Upsarpanch, President and Vice-President) Nirvachan Niyam, 1995 - Rule 16(7)
AIR2001MP55
D.N. Shukla, Adv.
ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1. Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the 'returned candidate') as also respondent No. 2 (hereinafter after referred to as the 'election petitioner') were candidates for election to the office of the Vice-President of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevidayal Raikwar Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-08-2008
Service
2008(3)MPHT505
Mr. Sanjay Patel
ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. This is an appeal filed under Section 2(1) of the M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 against the order dated 14-3-2008 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 2766...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVirendra Kumar JaIn Vs. Kamlesh Namdeo
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-30-2013
Land Acquisition
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Second Appeal No.775/2009 Virendra Kumar Jain Vs. Kamlesh Namdeo (Dead) through Legal Representative. Counsel for the appellant : Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate. Counsel for the respondents :...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMulchand Vs. the State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-29-2013
Land Acquisition
Second Appeal No.551/1999 29.07.2013 Mr. Sanjay Patel, learned counsel with Mr. B.R. Koshta, Advocate for the appellant. Heard on I.A. No.1394/2013, an application under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure . Learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar Patel Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-22-2009
Criminal
2009(4)MPHT263
Mr. Sanjay Patel
ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the orders passed against him for externment under the State Security Act, 1990 (for short 'the Act of 1990'),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Rekha Dhurve (Markam) Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-16-2008
Service
2009(1)MPHT284
Mr. Sanjay Patel
ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. The petitioner is a Law Graduate and practicing lawyer and belongs to Dhurve Tribe of the State of Madhya Pradesh which is a Scheduled Tribe as per the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe Order, 1950....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnita Singh Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-16-2008
Service
2009(1)MPHT392
Mr. Sanjay Patel
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Pregnability of the order dated 23-11-2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 16024/2007 (S) is called in question by the appellant invoking the jurisdiction under Section 2(1) of the Madhya...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »