Advanced Search Results
Cellular Operators Association of India and ors. Vs. Municipal Corpora ...
Delhi
Apr-29-2011
Constitution
Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 10; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act (DMC Act) - Sections 349A, 99
Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan; Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Mr. Maninder Singh; Mr. Manjul Bajpai; Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advs.
1. These writ petitions impugn Office Order dated 20 th November, 2003, Circular dated 7 th February, 2008 and the Office Order dated 8th April, 2010 of the respondent MCD levying fee and stipulating other conditions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVirender Kumar @ Gara Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Delhi
Dec-18-2000
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 354; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27, 379 and 411; Delhi Police Act - Sections 92, 93 and 97; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154
2001IIIAD(Delhi)319
Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Adv
ORDERUsha Mehra, J.1. Prosecution charged the appellant Virender Singh for murdering Raj Kapoor son of Partap Singh PW on 25th May, 1991. The learned Additional Sessions Judge relying on the testimony of Partap Singh (PW-5) father...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShivalik Agro Poly Products Limited Vs. Disco Electronics Limited (In ...
Delhi
Jul-25-2001
Company
State Financial Corporation Act - Sections 29, 29(1 and 5), 32E and 32E(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 46B; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985
AIR2002Delhi10; [2003]114CompCas398(Delhi); 2001(59)DRJ698
Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Adv
ORDERSanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. The appellant company is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 13th September, 1996 of the learned Company Judge setting aside the sale of property no.A-83., Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-II, New Delhi (referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Deepali Designs and Exhibits Private Limited Vs. Pico Deepali Overlays ...
Delhi
Feb-22-2011
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Orders 39, 38, 40 Rules 1, 2, 5, 4; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Companies Act, 1956
Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Rakesh Mukhija, Advs.
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Yes Digest?1. The plaintiff has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Parkash Vs. State
Delhi
May-28-1998
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2) (1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 160
1998IVAD(Delhi)93; 1998(4)Crimes227; 75(1998)DLT69; 1998(47)DRJ569; 1998RLR478
Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Adv
ORDERMohd. Shamim, J.1.This appeal is directed against the judgment and orderdated September 28,1977 passed by a Special Judge, Tis Hazari, Delhi whereby the learned lower court found the convict/appellant ( hereinafter referred to as the appellant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskResources of Aviation Redressal Association Vs. Uoi and ors
Delhi
Jan-01-2011
Airports
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act, 2008 - Section 13; Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 - Sections 22A, 28K; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Section 5(1); Consumer Protection Act,1986 - Section 9; Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Section 202
Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Mr. Vinay Hegde; Mr. Rakesh Sinha; Mr. Pawan Kumar Bansal, Advs.
1. In these two writ petitions the controversy that emerges for consideration being similar, they were heard together and disposed of by a singular order. 2. We may not with profit that W.P.(C) No.3889/2011 has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Devinder Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. Realogy Corporation and anr.
Delhi
Jul-25-2011
Arbitration and Conciliation
Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 48, 11; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 24; Companies Act; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 96 - Orders 41, 11 Rules 1, 11
Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Mr. Ashish Dhaulakia; Mr. Anand Srivastava, Advs.
1. This Appeal challenges the Order dated 4.5.2011 of the learned Single Judge who has concluded that the Court cannot go into the controversy concerning the existence or validity of the Arbitration Clause invoked by one...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrown Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bhupinder Lal Ghai
Delhi
Sep-05-2011
Arbitration and Conciliation
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11; Delhi High Court Act - Section 10; Delhi High Court Arbitration Centre (Arbitrators Fee) Rules
Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Mr. Kirti Uppal; Mr. Sunil Narula; Mr.Badar Mahmood, Advs.
1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 14th July, 2011 passed by the learned Single Judge in IA No.8248/2009 and 8249/2011 in Arbitration Petition No.470/2009 and 471/2009 respectively. On a perusal of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Parkash Vs. Shri Randhir Singh
Delhi
Aug-31-1999
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4
1999VIAD(Delhi)185; 82(1999)DLT210
Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Adv
ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. This application has been filed for obtaining of restraint orders against the Defendant from selling, alienating, encumbering, transferring or otherwise parting with the possession of sundry immovable properties which are the subject matter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Textile Corporation (Dpandr) Ltd. Vs Punjab National Bank and ...
Delhi
Aug-25-2010
Land Acquisition
Mr. Sandeep Sethi,Sr, Mr. Sanjay Ghosh, Mr. Nikhil Bhalla, Advs.
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may Yes be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported Yes in the Digest?ORDER.1. By this petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »