Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr sandeep sethi · Page 1 of about 790 results (0.122 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 29 2011

Cellular Operators Association of India and ors. Vs. Municipal Corpora ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-29-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 10; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act (DMC Act) - Sections 349A, 99

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan; Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Mr. Maninder Singh; Mr. Manjul Bajpai; Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advs.

1. These writ petitions impugn Office Order dated 20 th November, 2003, Circular dated 7 th February, 2008 and the Office Order dated 8th April, 2010 of the respondent MCD levying fee and stipulating other conditions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2000

Virender Kumar @ Gara Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 354; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27, 379 and 411; Delhi Police Act - Sections 92, 93 and 97; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154

Reported in : 2001IIIAD(Delhi)319

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Adv

ORDERUsha Mehra, J.1. Prosecution charged the appellant Virender Singh for murdering Raj Kapoor son of Partap Singh PW on 25th May, 1991. The learned Additional Sessions Judge relying on the testimony of Partap Singh (PW-5) father...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2001

Shivalik Agro Poly Products Limited Vs. Disco Electronics Limited (In ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-25-2001

Subject : Company

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act - Sections 29, 29(1 and 5), 32E and 32E(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 46B; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985

Reported in : AIR2002Delhi10; [2003]114CompCas398(Delhi); 2001(59)DRJ698

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Adv

ORDERSanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. The appellant company is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 13th September, 1996 of the learned Company Judge setting aside the sale of property no.A-83., Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-II, New Delhi (referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 22 2011

Deepali Designs and Exhibits Private Limited Vs. Pico Deepali Overlays ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-22-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Orders 39, 38, 40 Rules 1, 2, 5, 4; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Companies Act, 1956

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Rakesh Mukhija, Advs.

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Yes Digest?1. The plaintiff has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 1998

Om Parkash Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-28-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2) (1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 160

Reported in : 1998IVAD(Delhi)93; 1998(4)Crimes227; 75(1998)DLT69; 1998(47)DRJ569; 1998RLR478

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Adv

ORDERMohd. Shamim, J.1.This appeal is directed against the judgment and orderdated September 28,1977 passed by a Special Judge, Tis Hazari, Delhi whereby the learned lower court found the convict/appellant ( hereinafter referred to as the appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 2011

Resources of Aviation Redressal Association Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-01-2011

Subject : Airports

Acts : Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act, 2008 - Section 13; Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 - Sections 22A, 28K; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Section 5(1); Consumer Protection Act,1986 - Section 9; Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Section 202

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Mr. Vinay Hegde; Mr. Rakesh Sinha; Mr. Pawan Kumar Bansal, Advs.

1. In these two writ petitions the controversy that emerges for consideration being similar, they were heard together and disposed of by a singular order. 2. We may not with profit that W.P.(C) No.3889/2011 has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2011

Dr. Devinder Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. Realogy Corporation and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-25-2011

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 48, 11; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 24; Companies Act; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 96 - Orders 41, 11 Rules 1, 11

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Mr. Ashish Dhaulakia; Mr. Anand Srivastava, Advs.

1. This Appeal challenges the Order dated 4.5.2011 of the learned Single Judge who has concluded that the Court cannot go into the controversy concerning the existence or validity of the Arbitration Clause invoked by one...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2011

Crown Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bhupinder Lal Ghai

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-05-2011

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11; Delhi High Court Act - Section 10; Delhi High Court Arbitration Centre (Arbitrators Fee) Rules

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Mr. Kirti Uppal; Mr. Sunil Narula; Mr.Badar Mahmood, Advs.

1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 14th July, 2011 passed by the learned Single Judge in IA No.8248/2009 and 8249/2011 in Arbitration Petition No.470/2009 and 471/2009 respectively. On a perusal of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1999

Om Parkash Vs. Shri Randhir Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-31-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)185; 82(1999)DLT210

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Adv

ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. This application has been filed for obtaining of restraint orders against the Defendant from selling, alienating, encumbering, transferring or otherwise parting with the possession of sundry immovable properties which are the subject matter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2010

National Textile Corporation (Dpandr) Ltd. Vs Punjab National Bank and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-25-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Sethi,Sr, Mr. Sanjay Ghosh, Mr. Nikhil Bhalla, Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may Yes be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported Yes in the Digest?ORDER.1. By this petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial