Advanced Search Results
Bridge and Roof Company [India] Ltd. Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Kolkata
Aug-05-2010
Education
Mr.S.N.Mukherjee, Sr. ; Mr.Ritzu Ghosal, Advs.
The Court : This application has to be adjourned for a period of four weeks. In that period or until further order, whichever is earlier, the status quo resulting from the existing orders regarding the subject...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPaharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. Vs. the Owners and Parties Interested in ...
Kolkata
Jun-26-2001
Civil
Admiralty Court's Act, 1861 - Sections 6 and 7;; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891;; Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925;; Multimodel transportation of Goods Act, 1993;; Supreme Court Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 20, 20A(2), 21 and 21(4); Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890;; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 443 and 444
AIR2001Cal213,(2001)2CALLT445(HC)
Mr. S.N. Mukherjee and ;Mr. Ratnaka Banerjee, Advs.
A.K. Ganguly, J. 1. The case of the plaintiff in this admiralty suit is based on a claim for damages. The case is that the ship M.V. Lima-I carried the Cargo belonging to the plaintiff and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBraithwaite Burn and Jessop Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. Indo Wagon Engin ...
Kolkata
Jun-28-2017
Arbitration
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN E.C.No.1 of 2017 Braithwaite Burn & Jessop Construction Co.LTD.Versus Indo Wagon Engineering LTD.For the Petitioner : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.S.N.Mukherjee, Sr.Adv.,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
UjjaIn Nagar Palika Nigam Vs. Official Liquidator and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-25-2007
Company
Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 135, 147, 184 and 185; ;Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1986; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 528, 529, 529(1), 529A and 530 and 530(1); ;Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Section 146; ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 97 and 147 to 179
[2009]149CompCas433(Cal)
Debal Kumar Banerjee and ;Devangshu Basak, Advs.;S.N. Mookerjee, Adv.
Indira Banerjee, J.1. The main issue involved in these two appeals under Rule 164 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, made by a judge's summons supported by affidavit, is the admissibility of post liquidation claims against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRabindra Kumar Bhalotia Vs. Union of India and ors.
Kolkata
Sep-24-2014
MRTP
TA No.139 of 2014 CS No.337 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE RABINDRA KUMAR BHALOTIA Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon’ble Justice Soumen Sen Date:24.09.2014 Appearance:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVs. The Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and Ors.
Kolkata
Aug-19-2016
Service Tax
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side APOT63of 2016 GA662of 2016 With W.P.170 of 2016 Ramesh Kumar & Company Private Limited & Anr. versus The Board of Trustees for the Port of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPradip Kumar Mondal Vs. Ssk Broking Services Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-19-2005
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; ;Stock Exchange Rules
AIR2005Cal353
ORDERAshim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. The petitioner had share transactions in respect of listed shares with a stock broker being the respondent No. 1 abovenamed. There had been disputes and differences between the parties. The petitioner approached...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovernment of West Bengal Vs. Chatterjee Petrochem (Mauritius) Co. and ...
Kolkata
Sep-21-2007
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 173, 289, 291, 397, 397(2), 398, 399, 399(1), 402, 403, 406, 617 and 619B; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 66 and 66(1); ;Companies Act, 1985 - Section 459; ;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 13, 14, 17 and 18; ;Constitution of India - Articles 33, 141 and 142; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 3; ;Unlisted Public Companies (Preferential Allotment) Rules, 2003 - Rule 6
[2008]143CompCas837(Cal)
Sudipto Sarkar, ;Siddartha Mitra, ;Moushmi Bhattacharya, Advs. for Chatterjee Petrochem (Mauritius) Co. and Chatterjee Petrochem (India) P. Ltd. ;S. Pal, ;D. Basak, ;Ratnanko Banerjee, ;Sanjay Kumar T
Jayanta Kumar Biswas, J.1. In these four appeals filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 an order of the Company Law Board, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dated January 31, 2007 See Chatterjee Petrochem (Mauritius)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBusiness Forms Ltd. and Ashoka Agencies
Kolkata
Jul-24-1995
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Section 439;; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 25(3);; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 18 and 19
AIR1996Cal153,[1999]95CompCas172(Cal)
ORDER1. This application has been made by Ashoka Agencies for the compulsory winding up of M/s. Business Forms Ltd. 2. The case'of the petitioner is, inter alia, to the effect that pursuant to and in terms...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCosmosteels Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-26-2004
Commercial
Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 2 and 25
AIR2005Cal53,I(2006)BC237,[2005]126CompCas210(Cal)
S.N. Mukherjee, ;Samrat Sen and ;R.L. Mitra, Advs.
ORDERAmitava Lala, J. 1. In between the respective parties the following suits were instituted in the High Court at Calcutta.(See Table below)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Suit No. Filed on Plaintiff Defendants ClaimRs.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------a)1046 17-9-87 Cosmosteels (P) Ltd. Punjab National Bank 6,36,631/-b)547...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »