Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr s d sanjay · Page 1 of about 22 results (0.551 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 24 2008

Amba Carbonisation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Nov-24-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.D. Sanjay

1. The petitioner is a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act. It set up a unit for manufacture of special smokeless fuel (for short, 'SSF Coke') at Gidha, Koilwar, District Bhujpur. The industry...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1997

Dr. Shrawan Kumar Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-22-1997

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.D. Sanjay

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. This application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal: Procedure (hereinafter to be referred to as the Code') for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding, including...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2026

Tavasya Ssf (C/O Tavasya Capital Managers Llp) vs Ministry of External ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-20-2026

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Anirban Bhattacharya, Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Mr. Manthan Dixit, Ms. Tanushvi Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision : 20.04.2026 + ARB.P. 1589/2025 TAVASYA SSF (C/O TAVASYA CAPITAL MANAGERS LLP) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anirban Bhattacharya, Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Mr. Manthan Dixit and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 24 2006

Neo Carbon Pvt. Limited Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-24-2006

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Sections 2, 4, 14, 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 24; Central Sales Tax Act; Bihar Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 - Rules 12, 12(1) and 19

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Sanjay and Suraj Samdarshi, Advs.K.N. Jain, Sr. Adv.

Aftab Alam, J.1. The question that arises for consideration in these two cases is whether it is permissible to claim adjustment of Central Sales Tax (CST) payable on sales of goods in course of Inter State...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2009

Shashi Kumar S/O Late Sureshwar Sharan Vs. the State of Bihar Through ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-31-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Income Tax Act - Section 194A(3); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 2(1) and 2(17); ;Financial Code; ;Civil Service Regulation; ;Service Conduct Rules; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 309 and 311

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Sanjay, Adv.

Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.1. The petitioner is an Assistant Executive Officer of the BIADA and is facing departmental proceeding. He has come to this Court against his order of suspension, as passed by the Managing Director...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2024

Omkar Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-15-2024

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : PULKIT AGARWAL __

2024 INSC775REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10611 OF2024Omkar Ramchandra Gond …Appellant (s) Versus The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondent(s) JUDGMENT K.V. Viswanathan, J.1. Omkar Ramchandra Gond (the appellant)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2015

S.J. Coke Industries Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-08-2015

Subject : Education

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 3399-3400 OF2015(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos.12925-12926/2013) S.J.Coke Industries Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Appellant(s) VERSUS Central Coalfields Ltd. Etc. Respondent(s) WITH Civil Appeal No.3419 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 1994

Sarswatiji Bhandar Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-15-1994

Subject : Sales Tax

K.S. Paripoornan, C.J.1. The petitioner is an assessee to Sales-tax. We are concerned with the assessment year 1983-84. Originally, the assessment was made for the said year, by Annexure-1, on 25-3-1985. By Annexure-2, re-assessment order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2006

Brajesh Choudhary Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-10-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 406, 408, 420, 468, 471, 477 and 1208; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 357, 377, 386, 397, 401, 401(1), 401(4), 406 and 431

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Sanjay, Soni Srivastava and P.C. Agrawal, Advs.

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J.1. On the basis of a report given to the Police, Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 57 of 2002 was registered against the petitioner and other accused persons. According to the first information...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2006

B.S. Enterprises Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Nov-08-2006

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Sections 14, 16, 16(1), 24, 56(2), 93, 94 and 95; Bihar Finance Act, 1981; Bihar Finance Act, 2006; Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 8(4), 13(3), 13(4) and 15; Mysore Sales Tax Act - Sections 5(4); Bihar Value Added Tax Rules - Rules 13, 56, 56(1) and 56(2); Land Ceiling Act; High Denomination Bank Notes (Demonetisation) Act, 1978; Bihar Value Added Tax Ordinance, 2005 - Sections 1(3) and 2 to 99; Mysore Sales Tax Rules - Rule 39A(2) and 39A(3); Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983 - Rule 35; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rules 7(3) and 9; Central Sales Tax (Kerala) Rules - Rule 6(1)

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Sanjay and Suraj Samdarshi, Advs. in C.W.J.C. No. 14725/05, Ramesh Kumar Agrawal, Anupanand Jha and Gopi Krishna, Advs. in C.W.J.C. Nos. 12390 & 12397 of 2005 and Prakash Sahay, Adv. in C.W.J.C.

Aftab Alam, J.1. Whether Rule 56 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Rule, 2005 can be so read as to give the prescribed authority the discretion to extend, in appropriate cases, the period for furnishing details...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial