Advanced Search Results

Mayank Pandey Vs. State and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rohit Chaudhary

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2206/2013 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2013 MAYANK PANDEY ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Chaudhary, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through:...

Prashant Gaurav vs Delhi High Court Through Registrar General & An ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal, Mr. Rohit Chaudhary

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11170/2023 PRASHANT GAURAV .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal, Mr. Rohit Chaudhary, Advocates.versusDELHI HIGH COURT THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Beenashaw N....

Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited vs.malvinder Mohan Singh and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 09.2017 Pronounced on:31. 01.2018 O.M.P.(EFA)(COMM.) 6/2016 DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv. Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Adv. and...

Twinkle Exports Vs. Tartans Infomark Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 439

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)333; [2000]100CompCas820(Delhi); 81(1999)DLT105; 1999(50)DRJ802; (1999)123PLR14

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rohit Chaudhary and; Mr. Alok Singh, Advs

ORDERDalveer Bhandari, J.1.The petitioner filed a petition under Section 433(e), 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent. The petitioner vide its letter dated 11.4.1997 has offered certain quotations for costume jewellery items...

Prakash Industries Limited Vs. Bajaj Auto Finance Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22

Reported in : 93(2001)DLT159; 2001(59)DRJ540

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Rohit Chaudhary, Adv

ORDERSanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. The appellant seeks protection under Sick Industrial Companies (special Provision) Act, 1985 (referred to as SICA) not only for the purposes of not paying the laser rentals but also as remedy...