Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Purshottam Khatri

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 5(1), 6(6), 10(4), 80L, 131, 132, 132(4), 143(3), 158BB(1), 158BC and 260A; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 13 and 14; Finance Act, 2002

Reported in : [2007]290ITR260(MP); 2006(3)MPLJ131

Advocate for Appellant : Rohit Arya and ;Sanjay Lal, Advs.

A.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. This is an appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') filed by the CIT against the order dt. 7th June, 2000 of the Tribunal.2. The facts briefly...

Nand Contr. and Engr. Thr G.D. Ahuja Vs. Northern Coal Field Ltd and a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Leave granted.2. We may take up Civil Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.24337 of 2009 as a lead case which arises out of a common judgment dated 14.11.2007 of the...

Anas Abdul Rashid MachiswalA. Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act - Section 3[1][3], 4, 20, 21[2][b], 22[3], 51, 23, 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 307; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act - Sections 3, 4; Bombay Police Act - Sections 135[1], 130; Explosive Substance Act - Sections 4, 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 219, 164, 311; Evidence Act - Section 30; Constitution of India - Article 21; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act - Section 15

Advocate for Appellant : MS NITYA RAMAKRISHNAN; MR ROHIT S VERMA; MR SOMNATH M VATSA, Advs.

1. As all the appeals involve common question of law and arise from the common judgment rendered in POTA Case No. 7 of 2003 and 9 of 2003, they are heard together and disposed of by...

Neelam Satija and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct (Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 498A

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)320

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rohit Minocha, Adv

ORDERCRL. W. No. 4/20001. This is a joint petition by the husband and wife as well as the complainant the author of FIR seeking quashing of FIR and the proceedings pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis...

B.K. Ahuja Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)657

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rohit Minocha, Adv

Dr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition praying for a direction to the respondents to pay to the petitioner his voluntary retirement dues for 10 years amounting to Rs. 1,48,200/- and...

Hi Point Services Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Chloro Controls (India) Pvt.Ltd. and or ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company Law

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 27

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Rohit Kapadia; Mr.J.P.Sen; Mr.Yash R.Kapadia; Mr.Simil Purohit; Mr.Pranav Desai; Mr.H.K.Sudhakara; Ms.Arundhati Iyer, Advs.

1. Both these appeals are instituted against the common judgment and order dated 23.12.2004 passed by the learned Single Judge in the Notice of Motion No.553 of 2004 and the Notice of Motion No.2382 of 2004...

Shri Krishan @ Satish @ Gitpitia Vs. Commissioner of Police and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2); Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25,54 and 59; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 392, 394, 398 and 411

Reported in : 2001CriLJ255; 2000(57)DRJ49

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rohit Sharma; amices Curia

ORDERUsha Mehra, J.1. Shrikishan Satish Gitpitia has assailed the order of detention dated 27th October,1999 passed under sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act,1980 (hereafter called the Act) inter alia, on the grounds...

Ashish Services Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.A. Niyazi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:26. h NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 305/2013 ASHISH SERVICES Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M.A. Niyazi and Mr.Manish Kumar, Advocates versus STATE & ORS....

Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.13 OF2015Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record - Association and another … Petitioner(s) versus Union of India … Respondent(s) With |WRIT PETITION (C) No.14 OF2015| |WRIT...

In Re The Proper Treatment Of Covid 19 Patients And Dignified Handling ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : BY COURTS MOTION __

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION SUO MOTU WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.7 OF2020IN RE: THE PROPER TREATMENT OF COVID19PATIENTS AND DIGNIFIED HANDLING OF DEAD BODIES IN THE HOSPITALS ETC. ORDER1 We have...