Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr ritesh bahri · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.037 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 14 2017

Maksud Ahmed vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2017

Subject : Education

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 11.08.2017 Judgment pronounced on:14. 09.2017 CRL.A. 207/2016 RAFIQUE Through Mr.Aditya Guar, Adv. with Mr.Chandan Kumar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2017

Nazim vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2017

Subject : Education

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 11.08.2017 Judgment pronounced on:14. 09.2017 CRL.A. 207/2016 RAFIQUE Through Mr.Aditya Guar, Adv. with Mr.Chandan Kumar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2017

Azmal @ Aslam vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2017

Subject : Education

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 11.08.2017 Judgment pronounced on:14. 09.2017 CRL.A. 207/2016 RAFIQUE Through Mr.Aditya Guar, Adv. with Mr.Chandan Kumar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 14 2017

Rahis vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2017

Subject : Education

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 11.08.2017 Judgment pronounced on:14. 09.2017 CRL.A. 207/2016 RAFIQUE Through Mr.Aditya Guar, Adv. with Mr.Chandan Kumar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2017

Rafique vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2017

Subject : Education

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 11.08.2017 Judgment pronounced on:14. 09.2017 CRL.A. 207/2016 RAFIQUE Through Mr.Aditya Guar, Adv. with Mr.Chandan Kumar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2019

Raja@ Dayanand vs.the State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-14-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ritesh Bahri, Mr. Vipin

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:14. h May, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 566/2019 & CRL.M.A. 10137/2019 RAJA@ DAYANAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ritesh Bahri and Mr. Vipin versus Bansal, Advs. $~60 *...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2019

Dayanand@ Raja Bansal vs.the State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-14-2019

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ritesh Bahri, Mr. Vipin

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:14. h May, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 568/2019 & CRL.M.A. 10156/2019 DAYANAND@ RAJA BANSAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ritesh Bahri and Mr. Vipin versus Bansal, Advs. $~62...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2013

Manjeet Singh and ors Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-06-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Reserved on:1st May, 2013 Date of Decision:6th May, 2013 % + BAIL APPLN. 631/2013 MANJEET SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr R S Juneja and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2026

Surinder Singh Bawa vs State of Delhi (Nct)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-2026

Subject : Right to Information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2274/2024 SURINDER SINGH BAWA .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSTATE OF DELHI (NCT) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Bahri, APP for State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 08.05.20261. No...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2010

Naresh Kumar Vs State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-18-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ritesh Bahri, Mr.Amit Tanwar , Mr.H.S.Khatana, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may No be allowed to see the Judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No3. Whether the judgment should be No reported in the Digest?ORDER.1. The present petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial