Advanced Search Results

M/S. Pee Kay Associates Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Railway Board Act, 1905;

Reported in : 2001IIAD(Delhi)773; AIR2001Delhi248; 91(2001)DLT279; 2001(58)DRJ208

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ravinder Sethi and; Mr. S.K. Taneja, Senior Advs.; Mr.

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioner was awarded the contract for providing the pantry car service on Rajdhani Express train Nos.2429/2430 operating on the Hazrat Nizammudin,New Delhi-Bangalore sector, with effect from 30th of December, 1995 for a period...

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. J.R. Gangwani and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 45; Contempt of Court Act, 1971

Reported in : 2003IIIAD(Delhi)272; 2003CriLJ2575; 104(2003)DLT387; 2003(68)DRJ561

Advocate for Appellant : Prashant Bhushan, amices Curia; A.K. Singh, Adv; V.K. Shali

Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. The facts giving rise to the present proceedings for contempt may be briefly noted. One Durga Devi had filed a petition impleading Anupam Gardens Friends Association as respondent No. 1 Chairman of...

Dsj Communication Ltd. Vs. Uoi and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Vikas Pathak

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.757/2014 & CMs No.19262/2014 (for stay), 19261/2014 (for condonation of 102 days delay in filing the appeal) & 19351/2014 (for condonation of 11...

Dsj Communication Ltd. Vs. Uoi and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Vikas Pathak

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.757/2014 & CMs No.19262/2014 (for stay), 19261/2014 (for condonation of 102 days delay in filing the appeal) & 19351/2014 (for condonation of 11...

Dsj Communication Ltd. Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Vikas Pathak

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.757/2014 & CMs No.19262/2014 (for stay), 19261/2014 (for condonation of 102 days delay in filing the appeal) & 19351/2014 (for condonation of 11...

Chandra Ballabh and anr. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IIAD(Delhi)838; 77(1999)DLT327; 1999(48)DRJ23

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G.D. Gupta, Adv

Vijender Jain, J.1.Two writ petitioners aggrieved by the selection of respondent No. 2 to the post of Commissioner (Planning) by the respondent No.1 has filed the present writ petition. Mr. G.D. Gupta, learned Counsel appearing for...

Commonwealth Games Village Allottees Welfare Assoc Vs. Dda and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment dated 07.02.2013 W.P.(C) 3703/2011 COMMONWEALTH GAMES VILLAGE ALLOTTEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramjit Srinivasan, Senior Advocate with Rahul Dhawan, Ms.Shobna...

Kusth Asha Deep Federation vs.ajoy K. Paitandy

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:25. h May, 2017 CONT.CAS(C) 224/2004 & CM Nos.11081/2011, 14689/2011, 5058/2016 & 6396/2017 KUSTH ASHA DEEP FEDERATION Through: Dr.Brahm Dutt and Mr.Vivek...

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Smt. Sushil Kaur and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : LimitationProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 41, Rule 1 - Order 42, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi104

Advocate for Appellant : Ravinder Seth, Sr. Adv. with;Sumit Bansa

1. The appellant Delhi Development Authority (in short DDA) preferred an appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Delhi dated 24th August, 1992. This appeal was filed on 13th December, 1993...

Assn. of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32, 226; Cinematograph Act - Sections 12; Delhi Cinematograph Rules, 1953 - Rules 3, 3(3), 23 and 47; Delhi Cinematograph (Amendment) Rules 1981; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Indian Electricity Act; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rules 32, 33, 36, 41, 42, 43, 50A, 51, 61A, 62(2), 63, 64, 64(2), 64A, 64A(2), 65 to 69; Delhi Fire (Prevention and Safety) Act, 1986; Delhi Fire (Prevention and Safety) Rules, 1987; Civil Law

Reported in : II(2003)ACC114; 2003ACJ1631; 2003IIIAD(Delhi)321; 104(2003)DLT234; 2003(68)DRJ128; 2003RLR333

Advocate for Appellant : K.T.S. Tulsi, Sr. Adv.,; Sultan Singh,; Vikas Pahwa and

ORDER'. The film had a patriotic fervor and was based on the 1971 Indo-Pak war. During the matinee show of the film, immediately after the interval, the audience in the cinema hall saw smoke coming out...