Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr ranjit saxena · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.043 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 15 2000

U.P. Judicial Services Association and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-15-2000

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC34; (2001)1UPLBEC502

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ranjit Saxena, Adv.

Binod Kumar Roy and S. K. Jain, JJ.1. Three-fold prayers have been made in this writ petition filed by U. P. Judicial Services Association of the State through its President and six Judicial Officers, who are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2000

Wipro Ltd. and Another Vs. Baba Enterprises

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-17-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 10, Rules 1, 2 and 4 - Order 14, Rules 1(1) and 3 - Order 18

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC996

Advocate for Appellant : Ranjit Saxena, Adv.

D. K. Seth, J. 1. Leave is granted to amend the preamble to the Section 115 application.2. Original Suit No. 274 of 1996 pending before the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), First Court, Dehradun, was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2004

Krishna Verma and anr. Vs. Director, Uttaranchal Power Corpn. and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Oct-25-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board Subordinate Electrical and Mechanical Engineering Service Regulations, 1972 - Regulation 17

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC206(UHC); [2005(104)FLR189]

Advocate for Appellant : V.B.S. Negi, Adv.

P.C. Pant, J.1. In all the above four petitions, common question of law and fact is involved as such these are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. These writ petitions are filed under Article 226...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 11 2016

Noida Toll Bridge Company Ltd. Vs. Federation of Noida Residents Welfa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-11-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Special Leave Petition (C) No……………….of 2016 (Diary No.36526 of 2016) NOIDA Toll Bridge Company Ltd. .... Petitioner(s) Versus Federation of NOIDA Residents Welfare Association & Ors...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2004

Guru Nanak Ice Factory Vs. Uttaranchal Power Corporation and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Aug-21-2004

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 79; Uttar Pradesh Electricity Supply (Consumers) Regulations, 1984 - Regulation 21

Reported in : AIR2005Utr1

Advocate for Appellant : C.D. Bahuguna, Sr. Adv.

V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J.1. Heard with the contest of Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ranjit Saxena, learned Standing Counsel for the Uttaranchal Power Corporation. Mr. Ranjit Saxena, learned counsel has produced before...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2007

G.M. Tanda thermal Power Project Vs. Jai Prakash Srivastava and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-11-2007

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act; Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Act

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR979]; (2008)ILLJ887SC; 2007(12)SCALE103

Advocate for Appellant : Ranjit Saxena,; Anita Pandey and; Vishnu Sharma, Advs

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. The State of Uttar Pradesh acquired land for the appellant company. Various land acquisition proceedings therefore were initiated. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, the acquiring authority, expressed its intention to engage...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1996

Dr. Manju Saxena Vs. Dr. Kuldeep Saxena and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-24-1996

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24

Reported in : I(1997)DMC323

Advocate for Appellant : Ranjit Saxena, Adv.

S.K. Phaujdar, J.1. This is an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Transferring Case No. 89 of 1988, Dr. Kuldeep Saxena v. Dr. Manju Saxena, from the Court of Principal Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial