Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr ramaswamy · Page 1 of about 385 results (0.152 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 23 1979

Manohar Narayan Joshi and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-23-1979

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(3), 5, 5(1), 5(2) and 27; Factories Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1980)ILLJ230Bom

Pratap, J.1. In this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners challenge the validity of a Notification dated 15th November, 1974 (Exhibit J to the petition) issued by the State Government by virtue of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1999

Brigadier Surender Kumar Sahni Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-13-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; defense Regulations, 1987 - Regulation 108

Reported in : 80(1999)DLT348

Advocate for Appellant : Shyamla Pappu, Sr. Adv. and; Viraj R. Datar, Adv

K. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The writ petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs : '(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2026

T.a. Joseph vs the Secretary

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-06-2026

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ramaswamy Rajarajan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 11.02.2026PRONOUNCED ON : 06.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU WP No. 34253 of 2007 T.A. Joseph Flat No.6, Block No.31,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 29 2007

J. Jayalalithaa Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 35B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 244, 245(1), 245(2) and 309

Reported in : [2008]300ITR399(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Venkataramani, Adv. for ;N. Jothi, Adv.

K. Mohan Ram, J.1. The brief facts that are necessary for the disposal of the above criminal original petition are set out below:(i) The respondent herein preferred a complaint against the petitioner under Section 35B of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1980

State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. V.G. Koppar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-21-1980

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 311 and 311(2)

Reported in : AIR1981Bom131

Advocate for Appellant : C.D. Shenoy, Asstt. Govt. Pleader

Bhonsale, J.1. The appellants, the State of Maharashtra and two others, challenge the judgment and decree passed by the Judge of the City Civil Court, Bombay, in Suit No. 3169 of 1961, decreeing the plaintiff's suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1987

Parkash Singh Badal and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-01-1987

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bengal Moneylenders Act - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6; Government of India Act; Constitution of India (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Constitution of India (l7th Amendment) Act, 1964; Agrarian Reforms Act; Impugned Act; Trade Union Act; Constitution of India (Fifty-Second Amendment) Act, 1985; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 7 and 105; National Insurance (Industrial Injuries) Act, 1946 - Sections 36(3); Conventicle Act; Foreign Compensation Act, 1950 - Sections 4(4); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Corrupt Practices Act; Law of Property Act, 1925 - Sections 56(1); Constitution of India - Articles 31A, 31B, 32, 101, 102, 132, 136, 191, 191(2), 192, 217(3), 226, 266, 368 and 368(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; Procedure and Conduct of Business Rules - Ru

Reported in : AIR1987P& H263

S.P. Goyal, J. 1. These three petitions (Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 3065, 3268 and 3435 of 1986), which are based on identical facts and involve common questions of law, have been filed for quashing the notices...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2011

M. Doddaiah and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its Principal Sec ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-14-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioners: Vijayashankar, Senior Counsel and R.S. Hegde, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R3 - Venkatesh.H. Dodderi, AGA R4 - K. Suman, U. Abdul Khader, S.V. Srinivasan Advocates.

(Prayer: This W.P. is filed praying to quash the resolution No.156/2003 dt. 12.9.2003, at Annexure passed by the Second respondent approving the layout plan submitted by the Vyalikaval house building Co.Op.Society limited-third respondent at Anx. J...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 2026

The Airports Authority of India vs Ashok Chacko

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-16-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND1. The Airports Authority Of IndiaRep by Authorised Representative Rep by The Chairman and Managing Director Rajiv Gandhi Bhavan New Delhi 110003 Office at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1974

Narayanan Nambeesan Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-16-1974

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR690

Sawant, J.1. Petitioners Nos. 1 and 2 in this petition were original accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Sessions Case No. 22 of 1970 tried by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli. The Sessions Court by its...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 1956

North Arcot District Central Co-operative Stores Ltd. Vs. State Govt. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-10-1956

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : AIR1957Mad163

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Ramaswami Mudaliar, Adv.

ORDERPanchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. I have perused the entire records and heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader, and see no reason to interfere, in the circumstances proved. Though Mr. Ramaswami Mudaliar,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial