Advanced Search Results

Kamalammal Vs. Board of Revenue by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxe ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Other Taxes

Reported in : (1964)1MLJ394

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ramanujam

ORDERK. Srinivasan, J.1. The petitioner was running a touring cinema. For a period of three months from 1st April, 1959 she had obtained a licence for a particular site and for another period a fresh licence...

Omana and ors. Vs. David and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1988)ACC93

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ramanujam

Shamsuddin, J.1. The plaintiffs in a suit for damages under the Fatal Accidents Act are appellants in this case. The suit was dismissed by the lower court holding that the accident occurred not due to rashness...

S. Ranga Rajendran and Two ors. Vs. S.K.A.R.S.M. Ramanatham Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : (1956)1MLJ173

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ramanujam

Somasundaram, J.1. This is a Revision Petition filed by the judgment-debtors in E.P. No. 83, of 1955 in O.S.No.138 of 1950 on the file of the Sub-Court, Madurai, against an order passed for proclamation of sale....

Joseph Tharmasekaran Vs. The Management of Papanasam Labour Welfare As ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 1st respondent relating to order dated 06.08.2003 dismissing the petitioner from...

P.K. Sivagaminatha Pillai Vs. N.K.S. Dharmalinga Mudaliar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19 and 19(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1963Mad21

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramanujam and ;J. Kanakaraj, Advs.

Kailasam, J. 1. The third defendant in the suit is the appellant in this second appeal. The plaintiff filed the suit on a mortgage bond dated 14-3-1934 executed by one Sankaran Chettiar on his behalf and...

State of Madras Vs. H. Kanchilal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1956]7STC606(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Ramanujam, Adv. for ;K. Veeraswami, The Assistant Government Pleader

Krishnaswami Nayudu, J.1. This appeal is by the State against the decree of the lower courts holding that the assessment of the sales tax at the enhanced rate of 4J pies in the rupee in respect...

State of Madras by Collector of Coimbatore Vs. H. Kanchilal, by Power- ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : (1956)2MLJ205

Krishnaswami Nayudu, J.1. This appeal is by the State against the decree of the lower Courts holding that the assessment of the sales-tax at the enhanced rate of 4 pies in the rupee in respect of...

Pilmen Agents (Private) Ltd., Madras Vs. Collector of Customs, Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12; Indian Tariff Act 1934 - Sections 28(1), 147 and 147(1); Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20 and 39

Reported in : AIR1967Mad124

ORDER1. W.P. No. 621 of 1965 was filed by the petitioners, clearing agents in the Madras Port, for the issue of a writ of prohibition against the Collector of Customs, Madras, restraining him from seizing the...

Apparswami Chettiar Vs. Sri Parvathavardhani Sametha Ramanatheeswara

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Schedule - Article 1; Madras Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Sections 8

Reported in : AIR1961Mad527

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ramanujam, Adv. for ;Govt. Pleader;P.V. Subramanyam, Adv.

ORDERRamachandra Iyer, J.1. This is a revision petition at the instance of the defendant in O. S. No. 297 of 1958 against an order directing payment of court-fee in regard to a claim for improvements made...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ponni Sugars and Chemicals Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(1)

Reported in : (2003)179CTR(Mad)477

Advocate for Appellant : T.C.A. Ramanujam, Sr. Standing Counsel

ORDERR. Jayasimha Babu, J.1. The two questions referred to us for our consideration, at the instance of the Revenue are:-1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in...